Article View: alt.linux
Article #1112Re: Introduction to Linux article for commentary
From: Christopher Browne
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
40 lines
3518 bytes
3518 bytes
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw a time when vladr13@my-deja.com would say: >Those who are trying to find a place for open source software are >wrong. Free software is clearly anti-capitalist. The suceess of Linux >abnd other open source projects cleasrly shows that capitalism is >doomed, it show that thousands of people can work together on a product >as free people outside of opressive corporate enviroment and create a >great product distributed for free. Sopom , not only software but other >products like cars will be made in anarchist collectives, there will >be no money, no private property. no monsters like Microsoft. If "free software" is anti-capitalist, so also are such things as: a) Working for wages rather than for capital participation, b) Government regulations that force people to be employees rather than independent contractors (thus throttling attempts to establish independent sources of share capital), c) Labour unions, which impinge on the power of the "capitalists." The claim that something is "anti-capitalist" is usually an attempt to wave a flag to get Americans that don't think enough to realize that their economic system is basically NOT a "capitalist" system to start "flag-waving" in favor of "America is Great, Democracy is Good, Capitalism is The Only Efficient Way," and to shut their minds off to any minor discrepancies such as *actual details.* (With the relative paucity of participation in capital markets, it is fairly evident that while there may be substantial control *OF AMERICA* by holders of capital, as is true for many nations, the nation does not basically run as a "capitalist economy.") Moving to a system run by "anarchist collectives" seems to me to be about as likely as everyone agreeing that RMS has a wonderful singing voice when he sings the "free software song," and the BSD folk deciding that they've been wrong the whole time and that the GPL is truly a much better license. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" cbbrowne@hex.net - - <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrn8echle.d20.cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8baq2v$uq0$1@newsreaderm1.core.theplanet.net> <8bb7dc$m5f$1@srv4-poa.zaz.com.br> <slrn8dicgr.ef6.mr_organic@strider.monty.net> <8bbht8$bie$1@srv4-poa.zaz.com.br> <8c5cn1$uj6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: faa64,449c23a868cbf64d X-Google-Attributes: gidfaa64,public X-Google-Thread: 100c5f,449c23a868cbf64d X-Google-Attributes: gid100c5f,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,449c23a868cbf64d X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,b44cd5236857d91,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (Christopher Browne) Subject: Re: Introduction to Linux article for commentary Date: 2000/04/01 Message-ID: <slrn8echle.d20.cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org> X-Deja-AN: 605351247 References: <8baq2v$uq0$1@newsreaderm1.core.theplanet.net> <8bb7dc$m5f$1@srv4-poa.zaz.com.br> <slrn8dicgr.ef6.mr_organic@strider.monty.net> <8bbht8$bie$1@srv4-poa.zaz.com.br> <8c5cn1$uj6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-realname: vladr13@my-deja.com X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy X-Trace: sv2-CiL8F8DbPuZzzrjEcEFTEaf/NmiCLjpPz+IYEtNFJOGvfqQOOLmTKsOr1VzKyYPsckWk+jgT633jmYI!BXrgNZUolggfVu8ttHlUHA== Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (Linux) Reply-To: cbbrowne@hex.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 12:57:55 CST Newsgroups: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss