Article View: alt.msdos.programmer
Article #449Re: 386 instructions
From: D Spinellis
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1990 17:21
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1990 17:21
24 lines
1858 bytes
1858 bytes
In article <1990Jan17.102756.8171@idt.unit.no> torb@grimne.UUCP (Tor Brekke) writes: >In article <1451@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> dds@cc.ic.ac.uk (Diomidis Spinellis) writes: >>Sorry, but the above is not exactly correct. It is true that most of the >>386 instructions can be used in the real mode, but the segment limit is >>still limited to 64K. > >Sorry, byt this is not correct either. It is possible to trick the 386 >into beliving that it's segments are larger than 64K in real mode. [...] >If a descriptor i set up >with a limit larger than 64K and left in one of the segment registers >when reentering real mode, the processor will still believe that the >segment has the old size. Is this a bug of the 386 or a documented feature? I have not found any mention of it in the Intel literature. It sounds very useful, but if it is undocumented it might go away in new chip releases. Diomidis -- Diomidis Spinellis Internet: dds@cc.ic.ac.uk Department of Computing BITNET: dds@cc.ic.ac.uk Imperial College UUCP: ...!cernvax!cc.imperial.ac.uk!dds London SW7 2BZ JANET: dds@uk.ac.ic.cc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1452@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!tsun6.doc.ic.ac.uk!zmact61References:
<13346@garnet.BBN.COM> <580@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <6142@internal.Apple.COM> <8166@portia.Stanford.EDU> <1451@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <1990Jan17.102756.8171@idt.unit.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!tsun6.doc.ic.ac.uk!zmact61 From: zmact61@tsun6.doc.ic.ac.uk.doc.ic.ac.uk (D Spinellis) Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: 386 instructions Message-ID: <1452@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> Date: 17 Jan 90 17:21:18 GMT References: <13346@garnet.BBN.COM> <580@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <6142@internal.Apple.COM> <8166@portia.Stanford.EDU> <1451@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <1990Jan17.102756.8171@idt.unit.no> Sender: news@doc.ic.ac.uk Reply-To: zmact61@doc.ic.ac.uk (D Spinellis) Organization: Imperial College Department of Computing Lines: 24