Article View: alt.msdos.programmer
Article #797Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0
From: martens p
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:51
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:51
24 lines
1525 bytes
1525 bytes
In article <richard.724767664@dutepp13> Richard.Kooijman@dnpap.et.tudelft.nl (Richard Kooijman) writes: >I admit we don't have 6.01 or 6.0A but Microsoft Netherlands wants you >to specifically point out where the bugs are in the compiler >otherwise you don't get a update. Go figure, that isn't our job! >We paid for a compiler but get something with bugs WE have to find! I have found the Microsoft people in the Netherlands to be *very* helpful and knowledgable. I have received minor updates, technical notes and even reprints of useful articles from them, all for free. Maybe you have an attitude problem? >You work with Microsoft, can't you provide us with a C 6.01? I sure hope Keith has something better to do. > >We will would 'like' to settle with that until Borland comes out >with another fine product. And deal with Borland support? Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec21.145148.1144@prl.philips.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!relay.philips.nl!prle!martensReferences:
<richard.723974524@dutepp6> <1992Dec17.163750.29719@microsoft.com> <richard.724767664@dutepp13>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer,comp.windows.ms.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!relay.philips.nl!prle!martens From: martens@prl.philips.nl (martens p) Subject: Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 Message-ID: <1992Dec21.145148.1144@prl.philips.nl> Sender: news@prl.philips.nl (USENET News System) Organization: Philips Research Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands References: <richard.723974524@dutepp6> <1992Dec17.163750.29719@microsoft.com> <richard.724767664@dutepp13> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:51:48 GMT Lines: 25