Article View: alt.msdos.programmer
Article #845Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0
From: Richard Kooijman
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 12:21
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 12:21
51 lines
2886 bytes
2886 bytes
keithro@microsoft.com (Keith Rowe) writes: >Just to clarify - there is a version of MS C/C++ 7.0 that runs on OS/2 1.x. >It generates code for DOS or Windows only. It is meant to be a transition >for people who have used previous MS products on OS/2. >The files needed to run C7 on OS/2 are available on Compuserve in the >Microsoft Languages Forum Library. You need to have the DOS/Windows >version of the product since the Compuserve files only provide compiler, >linker and PWB versions that run on OS/2 1.x. >Microsoft supports this version of the product via Compuserve. Why would I want that? We want OS/2 as a development environment for several reasons: multitasking, more memory (without something of a hack like 386MAX), protected memory access. If I use C 7.0 to develop programs for DOS/Windows there is little use in doing that under OS/2. The programs cannot be run on that in the same environment (protected memory). They will be put in a DOS box or WIN/OS2 box. I want a environment AND compiler for OS/2 and Microsoft is NOT offering that. We will wait for Borland who promised to make an OS/2 compiler, and if they don't we will take IBM CSET. Now we are using C 6.0, which is as bug ridden as C 7.0 (a bit less in fact, but they are both NOT professional compilers, but over-priced do-it-yourself tools). I admit we don't have 6.01 or 6.0A but Microsoft Netherlands wants you to specifically point out where the bugs are in the compiler otherwise you don't get a update. Go figure, that isn't our job! We paid for a compiler but get something with bugs WE have to find! You work with Microsoft, can't you provide us with a C 6.01? We will would 'like' to settle with that until Borland comes out with another fine product. Richard. -- -- ir Richard Kooijman ------------------- Email: R.Kooijman@ET.TUDelft.NL -- -- Intelligent Network Management Project (INEMA) --------------------------- -- CARDIT, Delft University of Technology ------------ Tel: (31)-15-786209 -- -- P.O.Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands ------ Fax: (31)-15-784898 --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<richard.724767664@dutepp13>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!donau!richardReferences:
<1992Dec7.175144.16097@duttncb.tn.tudelft.nl> <1992Dec8.235645.18245@netcom.com> <richard.723974524@dutepp6> <1992Dec17.163750.29719@microsoft.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer,comp.windows.ms.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!donau!richard From: Richard.Kooijman@dnpap.et.tudelft.nl (Richard Kooijman) Subject: Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 Message-ID: <richard.724767664@dutepp13> Sender: news@donau.et.tudelft.nl (UseNet News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: dutepp13.et.tudelft.nl Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering References: <1992Dec7.175144.16097@duttncb.tn.tudelft.nl> <1992Dec8.235645.18245@netcom.com> <richard.723974524@dutepp6> <1992Dec17.163750.29719@microsoft.com> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 12:21:04 GMT Lines: 51