🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.msdos.programmer
Article #845

Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0

#845
From: Richard Kooijman
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 12:21
51 lines
2886 bytes
keithro@microsoft.com (Keith Rowe) writes:

>Just to clarify - there is a version of MS C/C++ 7.0 that runs on OS/2 1.x.
>It generates code for DOS or Windows only.  It is meant to be a transition
>for people who have used previous MS products on OS/2.  

>The files needed to run C7 on OS/2 are available on Compuserve in the
>Microsoft Languages Forum Library.  You need to have the DOS/Windows
>version of the product since the Compuserve files only provide compiler,
>linker and PWB versions that run on OS/2 1.x.

>Microsoft supports this version of the product via Compuserve.

Why would I want that? We want OS/2 as a development environment
for several reasons: multitasking, more memory (without something of
a hack like 386MAX), protected memory access.

If I use C 7.0 to develop programs for DOS/Windows there is
little use in doing that under OS/2. The programs cannot be run on that
in the same environment (protected memory). They will be put in a
DOS box or WIN/OS2 box.

I want a environment AND compiler for OS/2 and Microsoft is NOT
offering that. We will wait for Borland who promised to make
an OS/2 compiler, and if they don't we will take IBM CSET.

Now we are using C 6.0, which is as bug ridden as C 7.0 (a bit less
in fact, but they are both NOT professional compilers, but
over-priced do-it-yourself tools).

I admit we don't have 6.01 or 6.0A but Microsoft Netherlands wants you
to specifically point out where the bugs are in the compiler
otherwise you don't get a update. Go figure, that isn't our job!
We paid for a compiler but get something with bugs WE have to find!

You work with Microsoft, can't you provide us with a C 6.01?

We will would 'like' to settle with that until Borland comes out
with another fine product.




Richard.


--
-- ir Richard Kooijman ------------------- Email: R.Kooijman@ET.TUDelft.NL --
-- Intelligent Network Management Project (INEMA) ---------------------------
-- CARDIT, Delft University of Technology ------------ Tel: (31)-15-786209 --
-- P.O.Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands ------ Fax: (31)-15-784898 --
Technical Details
Message-ID: <richard.724767664@dutepp13>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!donau!richard
References: <1992Dec7.175144.16097@duttncb.tn.tudelft.nl> <1992Dec8.235645.18245@netcom.com> <richard.723974524@dutepp6> <1992Dec17.163750.29719@microsoft.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!donau!richard
From: Richard.Kooijman@dnpap.et.tudelft.nl (Richard Kooijman)
Subject: Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0
Message-ID: <richard.724767664@dutepp13>
Sender: news@donau.et.tudelft.nl (UseNet News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dutepp13.et.tudelft.nl
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
References: <1992Dec7.175144.16097@duttncb.tn.tudelft.nl> <1992Dec8.235645.18245@netcom.com> <richard.723974524@dutepp6> <1992Dec17.163750.29719@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 12:21:04 GMT
Lines: 51