Re: EMACS

Article View: alt.msdos.programmer

Article #953

Back to alt.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#953

From: Russ Nelson
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 22:28

15 lines
1345 bytes

In article <1991May14.202420.26958@cci632.cci.com> keb@cci632.cci.com (Ken Bernstein) writes:

    Does anyone have experience with both Freemacs and MicroEMACS and have an
   *objective* opinion of the two? Or, is there another shareware EMACS for
   MS-DOS boxes that is superior to the two that I have mentioned?

Basically, it's like this: Choose Freemacs if you want the best GNU
Emacs emulation and don't need to edit files >64K.  Choose MicroEMACS
if you want to be able to run the exact same program on both DOS and
Unix.

--
--russ <nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu> I'm proud to be a humble Quaker.
Clear cutting is criminal, spiking trees is criminal, and using hyperbole of
this magnitude in a serious discussion is criminal.  -- Irv Chidsey

Technical Details

Message-ID: <NELSON.91May14222846@sun.clarkson.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!clarkson!grape.ecs.clarkson.edu!nelson

References: <1991May14.202420.26958@cci632.cci.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.emacs
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!clarkson!grape.ecs.clarkson.edu!nelson
From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
Subject: Re: EMACS
Reply-To: nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu (aka NELSON@CLUTX.BITNET)
Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam NY
Distribution: usa
Date: 14 May 91 22:28:46
Message-ID: <NELSON.91May14222846@sun.clarkson.edu>
In-Reply-To: keb@cci632.cci.com's message of Tue, 14 May 1991 20:24:20 GMT
References: <1991May14.202420.26958@cci632.cci.com>
Sender: usenet@grape.ecs.clarkson.edu

Reply to Parent Message