Thread View: alt.os.linux.caldera
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Larry
Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00
Re: Caldera Vs RH5
Author: Larry
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00
17 lines
1434 bytes
1434 bytes
On 18 May 1998 00:52:10 GMT, Jim Stokes <jim@thebeach.wilmington.net> wrote: >>So, Qt's license encourages commercial vendors to put there software under a >>free license. > >No it doesn't. It encourages folks to try it out with free software >and then want to buy it to use it for commercial software. Qt's license >encourages folks to use Qt because they think it's free and then be >coerced into paying for it when they need something for a commercial >app. IT never ceases to amaze me that those who take and use products made from the sweat of another man's brow have the FUCKING, UNMITIGATED, GALL to bitch and whine like some fucking RED COMMUNIST when that person tries to make a living from his work. I hope you're electricuted the next time you touch a computer you sniveling little bastard.
Re: Caldera Vs RH5
Author: Jim Stokes
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 00:00
30 lines
2273 bytes
2273 bytes
On 19 May 98 03:01:04 GMT, Larry <larry@over.here.com> wrote: >On 18 May 1998 00:52:10 GMT, Jim Stokes <jim@thebeach.wilmington.net> wrote: >>>So, Qt's license encourages commercial vendors to put there software under a >>>free license. >> >>No it doesn't. It encourages folks to try it out with free software >>and then want to buy it to use it for commercial software. Qt's license >>encourages folks to use Qt because they think it's free and then be >>coerced into paying for it when they need something for a commercial >>app. > >IT never ceases to amaze me that those who take and use products made from >the sweat of another man's brow have the FUCKING, UNMITIGATED, GALL to bitch >and whine like some fucking RED COMMUNIST when that person tries to make a >living from his work. I hope you're electricuted the next time you touch a >computer you sniveling little bastard. It never ceases to amaze me how those who read Usenet have the FUCKING, UNMITIGATED, GALL to go off half cocked when making assumptions. I have no problem with folks making a living selling Qt. I do have a problem when they disguise it as free. It is not. If someone decides they like it and are willing to pay for it, fine. I just don't want folks confused by the fact that it *appears* free when in reality it is not. -- Jim Stokes jim.stokes@wilmington.net
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads