🚀 go-pugleaf

> As Cedric says they need be on seperate subnets, however when your
> current subnet mask is bitwise AND'ed with either of the two current
> addresses you specify it can't see any difference between the subnets.
> The solution   is to reallocate either of the two IP addresses so that
> they  appear different using your existing subnet mask or to change the
> last part of your subnet mask to
> 248 = 1111 1000

i get from my isp 16 addresses this can only be done by a subnet
255.255.255.240 (210.2.5.16-31) - i think so!? if i am wrong - please
correct me... and please tell my why (newbie :-((( ). this is the situation
i'm in - and i need to workaround - how ever!

can i change the subnetmask without telling this my isp? realy i haven't
anytime worked with calculating ip subnets... and haven't deep tcpip
knowledge :-((( one of my greatest problems...

am i right and will this be working if i will change this to
eth0 = 210.2.5.17 / 255.255.255.252 - (210.2.5.16-19)
eth1 = 210.2.5.20 / 255.255.255.248 - (210.2.5.16-23)
eth2 = 210.2.5.24 / 255.255.255.248 - (210.2.5.24-31)

hm... looks wrong... eth0 and eth1 having overlapping ip's... in eth0 .19 is
broadcast adress and in eth1 the .23 - this looks like only 2 hosts in
dmz... shit...

hm. i don't realy need to route the official ip address over eth2 - i can
masquerade - if no other way is possible... but this might bei a bad
workaround, on my view.


Alex