Article View: alt.os.linux.suse
Article #393Re: Dual Processor Query
From: ray
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 14:20
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 14:20
57 lines
2965 bytes
2965 bytes
On Mon, 17 May 2004 01:28:47 +0000, Chris Cox wrote: > Zero_G wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm using SuSE 8.2 Professional (free magazine DVD version) on an Athlon >> 700MHz and thinking of saving up for a Dual Processor system. >> Is this even slightly worth the comparatively enormous outlay for a home >> user? > > Sure. But I never spend a whole lot on my dual systems. My wife's > dually cost us $700USD (dual MP2000+ with 512M, onboard SCSI, 36G 10K > drive). I recently purchased a dual 2.8Ghz Xeon with 1G, onboard > SCSI and a 120G IDE drive for $1225. My latest purchase, dual 3.2Ghz > Xeons, 2G, 3 x 15K 18G SCSI drives for a little less than $2000. > > If you shop for good deals, you can get what you want fairly cheap. > >> >> You see I've read a lot about various software support for this type of >> hardware and it loks like there are competing solutions to implement >> parallel/SPM hardware at the moment. > > uhhh... what? I guess... err... what? > >> >> I understand that gcc has libraries to allow for compiling software to be >> multi threaded but the source needs to be written with multi-threading in >> mind. > > Biggest mistake a person can make is to assume that dual processors > require threaded processes. Realize that EVERY process is assigned > a CPU when run... so on a Linux box, with 20-30 processes (these > are proceses that are started behind your back) will be spread > across CPUs resulting in better performance and a much smoother > feel. > >> >> Is there a list of packages with sources that are optimised for dual >> processors? > > Any program that uses threads OR any program that consists of multiple > processes will benefit from multiple CPUs. > >> >> This would be an extremely useful variable in justifying the extra outlay. >> >> Thanks. >> >> > > Word of warning, once you experience a dual processor system, you'll > NEVER want to go back. I worked on a DELL dual 1.7 Xeon system with RH for a couple of years before I retired - I have a single 2.4 P4 at home, and don't really miss the DELL.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2gs022F6511aU3@uni-berlin.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mailReferences:
<c88251$cbg$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> <c89m02$ree@library2.airnews.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1041dd,93dfb444fae3c74 X-Google-Thread: 102b32,93dfb444fae3c74 X-Google-Thread: 111053,93dfb444fae3c74 X-Google-Attributes: gid1041dd,gid102b32,gid111053,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "ray" <ray@zianet.com> Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.suse,linux.kernal,comp.os.linux.hardware,freeserve.help.unix Subject: Re: Dual Processor Query Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 08:20:50 -0600 Lines: 58 Message-ID: <2gs022F6511aU3@uni-berlin.de> References: <c88251$cbg$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> <c89m02$ree@library2.airnews.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de zjG52EZKJG1Jl2JQGPS2rA4KznYdObea/fcW8TxHS+OO34FK4T User-Agent: Pan/0.13.0 (The whole remains beautiful)