🚀 go-pugleaf

"Lionel" <usenet@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
news:f0s0kp$jao$8@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:50:12 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <spunky@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>> "Lionel" <usenet@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>> news:f0rsoq$c50$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:47:00 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>> <spunky@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:sogh7.k5f.17.1@news.alt.net
>>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou that work for bread. Thou
>>>>> pinch-spotted, broken-backed owl. Ye incited:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:35:42 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>> <spunky@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> You started this, and I tried the threat of posting your
>>>>>>> unsolicited, unwanted email as an incentive to stop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You posted personal email about an ex. That makes you scum. There
>>>>>> is no spin you can put on that that makes it even slightly
>>>>>> acceptable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leave me alone. Completely. Both of you. And no, I am not
>>>>>>>> trolling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is usenet. Use your killfile. I'm not posting in any groups
>>>>>>> that I've not been posting in for months.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are a vile and obnoxious harridan. Get out of my life once
>>>>>>>> and for all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not in your life. This is usenet, as you keep telling me and
>>>>>>> everyone else. It's not real life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You've tried to run me off this group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "This is usenet" "It's not real life"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You set Lionel, your
>>>>>>> stalker-by-proxy, on me, and he hasn't stopped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nobody "set me" on you, Rodenta. I am attacking you because your
>>>>>> online behaviour makes me want to puke.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But you expect everyone
>>>>>>> who is not on your side to stop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You want it over, make it over, but don't tell me that I have to
>>>>>>> stop when it still continues to my detriment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As long as you continue posting to AUK, I will attack you. If you
>>>>>> stop posting to AUK, I for one, will stop attacking you. While
>>>>>> you continue to post here, there is nothing that you - or your
>>>>>> forging, net-abusing friends - can say or do that will stop me
>>>>>> from giving you the bitch-slappings that you've worked so hard
>>>>>> to deserve.
>>>>>
>>>>> "But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist."
>>>>> <--- 100% pure, unadulterated bunny-boiler logic. Damn those
>>>>> established patterns that allegedly do not exist, Lionel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, to the point... following on from your idea of
>>>>> bitchslapping... I was advised by AFP investigators to give a very
>>>>> clear warning message, which could not be misinterpreted; they
>>>>> also laid out the possibilities and options should the warning be
>>>>> ignored by one or the other or both, and they indicated the time
>>>>> required to get the local case together and to petition US
>>>>> authorities for their involvement. They also indicated what I can
>>>>> and can't say so, other than saying:
>>>>>
>>>>> One has already impetuously ignored the clear warning and
>>>>> dismissed it out of hand.
>>>>
>>>> I await this with much eagerness.
>>>>
>>>> You may let them know that I will cooperate fully in their
>>>> investigation, including producing full chat logs as well as email
>>>> and posts, and the entire contents of my computer, if so required.
>>>> Luckily enough, I never reformatted, so it's all here, easily
>>>> accessible, including full backups.
>>>
>>> None of which is worth much in court, if it hasn't been collected by
>>> means of a 3am swoop by the Fed's own IT forensics people, & not
>>> even then if the target is forewarned. This is because it's so
>>> incredibly easy to alter that kind of data post facto that even a
>>> total clubie like you could manage it.
>>
>> <shrug> We both have the same exact evidence.
>>
>> If mine's no good, his is no good either.
>>
>> All the mail I received and sent is still on the GMail server. And a
>> number of newsservers have retention that goes back that far.
>
> And you think that neither can be fucked with? <snicker>

Are you planning to fuck with evidence, Lionel?

Good to know.

>> About the
>> only things that don't have a similar anchor are photographic, and
>> they're easily verified by other means. It shouldn't be hard to
>> establish what went on and when, especially since the emails and
>> posts verify the chats.
>
> You should keep on telling yourself that - I'm sure it'll make you
> feel better at night.

It's as I said, the same evidence works for everyone--as well as the 
same proscriptions.

-- 
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle