🚀 go-pugleaf

"Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:sogh7.k5f.17.1@news.alt.net
> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou that work for bread. Thou
> pinch-spotted, broken-backed owl. Ye incited:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:35:42 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>> <spunky@databasix.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> You started this, and I tried the threat of posting your
>>> unsolicited, unwanted email as an incentive to stop.
>>
>> You posted personal email about an ex. That makes you scum. There is
>> no spin you can put on that that makes it even slightly acceptable.
>>
>>>> Leave me alone. Completely. Both of you. And no, I am not trolling.
>>>
>>> This is usenet. Use your killfile. I'm not posting in any groups
>>> that I've not been posting in for months.
>>>
>>>> You are a vile and obnoxious harridan. Get out of my life once and
>>>> for all.
>>>
>>> I'm not in your life. This is usenet, as you keep telling me and
>>> everyone else. It's not real life.
>>>
>>> You've tried to run me off this group.
>>
>> "This is usenet" "It's not real life"
>>
>>> You set Lionel, your
>>> stalker-by-proxy, on me, and he hasn't stopped.
>>
>> Nobody "set me" on you, Rodenta. I am attacking you because your
>> online behaviour makes me want to puke.
>>
>>> But you expect everyone
>>> who is not on your side to stop.
>>>
>>> You want it over, make it over, but don't tell me that I have to
>>> stop when it still continues to my detriment.
>>
>> As long as you continue posting to AUK, I will attack you. If you
>> stop posting to AUK, I for one, will stop attacking you. While you
>> continue to post here, there is nothing that you - or your forging,
>> net-abusing friends - can say or do that will stop me from giving
>> you the bitch-slappings that you've worked so hard to deserve.
>
> "But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist." <---
> 100% pure, unadulterated bunny-boiler logic. Damn those established
> patterns that allegedly do not exist, Lionel.
>
> Anyway, to the point... following on from your idea of
> bitchslapping... I was advised by AFP investigators to give a very
> clear warning message, which could not be misinterpreted; they also
> laid out the possibilities and options should the warning be ignored
> by one or the other or both, and they indicated the time required to
> get the local case together and to petition US authorities for their
> involvement. They also indicated what I can and can't say so, other
> than saying:
>
> One has already impetuously ignored the clear warning and dismissed
> it out of hand.

I await this with much eagerness.

You may let them know that I will cooperate fully in their 
investigation, including producing full chat logs as well as email and 
posts, and the entire contents of my computer, if so required. Luckily 
enough, I never reformatted, so it's all here, easily accessible, 
including full backups.

> The other does so at their own peril. The LART of the
> century may be about to commence and I await the response of Michael
> Cranston. Preferably there will be no response because he knows that
> I know what his silence means. I can say no more.

-- 
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle