🚀 go-pugleaf

neeri@iis.ethz.ch (Matthias Neeracher) writes:

>In article <rauser.712715402@sfu.ca> rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John Rauser) writes:

>And alt.prose is not read by most readers of news.announce.important. Would
>that have been justification for you to post your message on
>news.announce.important? Post your stuff where it's appropriate.

   Chill out, grumpy. 

>>    I was banned from posting stories to alt.good.news because of the gut
>>reaction of an overly sensitive right-winger.

>Why do you think your opponent is a right-winger? A right-winger would have
>enjoyed your story about a God-fearing American boldly facing
>Hispano-Franco-Atheo-Communist scum, wouldn't he?

    Communist? Better read the story again, bub. 

>First of all, nobody prevents you from getting another account to continue posting
>your stories there.
>Furthermore, as far as I know, nobody has prevented you from posting the
>stories to alt.prose, which enjoys much further distribution anyway.
>And finally, your insisting on posting stories like "Danielle" on alt.good.news
>simply makes no sense. If you were prevented from posting dog stories to
>rec.pets.cats, would that be censorship?

   Sure would, if the dog stories were relevant to rec.pets.cats. If you lack
the depth of insight required to see that my stories _were_ relevant to     
alt.good.news (albeit in a twisted fashion :-) then you shouldn't be reading
alt.prose. 

-- 
Richard J. Rauser       "You have no idea what you're doing."
rauser@sfu.ca           "Oh, don't worry about that. We're professional 
WNI                        outlaws - we do this for a living."
--------
BANNED from alt.good.news! Censorship is alive and well on Usenet!