🚀 go-pugleaf

I see a lot of English words and terms, but you must have put them through a 
shredder before you posted them.



<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1175972165.165380.45120@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> At times of such an icy proto-moon representing itself as an incoming
> NEO having previously passed so close to impacting, it must have
> seemed exactly like the end of the world to many, and actually
> becoming the end of the world to many others caught in its gravity and
> aerobraking wake.  The actual glancing blow of that icy sucker upon
> having accomplished its dastardly deed, whereas I'd have to think a
> good third of most everything living upon this Earth would have been
> killed off or traumatised well enough past the point of no return.
>
> That true geology specified date of 11,700 BP also sounds just about
> right on the money for the final lithobraking, antipode worthy and
> seasonal tilt causing arrival of our moon, which should have seriously
> kicked planetology as well as human butt upon its icy arrival.  At the
> very least the near miss of such an icy proto-moon should have been
> downright interesting, if not a touch lethal for a great many.
>
> There should also have been significant teratonne bergs of moon ice
> falling upon Earth for a few thousands of years past the time of that
> initial glancing blow.
>
> BTW;  there's still nothing contained in any bible or koran, as
> interpreted to our environment having that moon as of prior to 10,000
> BC (12,007 BP), or even of somewhat earlier.  When exactly is the
> first humanly made record of our moon?
>
> What do you think about complex intelligent ET life, as for such
> having survived their extended interstellar trek, as safely coexisting
> within a few of those proto-moon ice caves? (I know that even I could
> do as much [how about yourself?])
>
> Within such a deep enough icy moon cave (assuming all the way down to
> the moon's surface) would have accommodated all the essential elements
> for survival, including sufficient isolation from the bad sorts of
> cosmic and solar radiation, and otherwise having provided loads of
> easily accessible O2 for sustaining our kind of frail DNA/RNA.
>
> I'm thinking our moon could have been covered by as much as a 262 km
> thick layer of salty ice, of which obviously lost much of its icy load
> upon encountering Earth, and especially that of our 1AU nearby solar
> energy would have summarily evaporated and/or having solar wind
> extracted all such vapors of salty ice that wasn't otherwise safely
> sequestered underground.
>
> That pesky GW traumatising moon of ours is still in the process of
> losing the remainders of its naked surface element of sodium. (not
> nearly enough gravity nor having a magnetosphere as to otherwise
> prevent the loss of such ice and sodium)
>
> Too bad the faith-based souls of this Earth are so afraid of their own
> shadows.  Too bad we still haven't accomplished the Earth/moon science
> platform as efficiently station-keeping itself within the moon's L1.
> Too bad we're headed directly for WWIII over the remains of the
> affordably accessible worth of global energy domination (including
> yellowcake).  Too bad that so many innocent folks have paid the
> ultimate price, with lots more about to pay their's (especially nasty
> if being Muslim is their only option within their established family
> traditions).
> -
> Brad Guth
>