Article View: alt.retromod
Article #12Re: bincancel:4 large binaries:AR130:@@NCM
From: Richard E. Depew
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 02:53
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 02:53
53 lines
3005 bytes
3005 bytes
Binary posts do not belong in unmoderated discussion groups. I have issued 4 cancels for large binary files (average size 299,320 characters - total size 1,197,283 characters) posted to 4 different unmoderated discussion groups in the comp and rec hierarchies as follows: 1 rec.travel.marketplace 1 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.sports 1 comp.sys.amiga.audio 1 comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot The cancels in the alt.binaries groups are an unavoidable consequence of the way cancels work. A cross-posted article is only one article. When it is canceled from an inappropriate group it is canceled from all groups. This pointer is being posted to each affected group. Each of the groups listed above is an affected group, meaning that at least one binary file was canceled from that group. If you want to see exactly which file that was or the criteria that I used to select it, read the full report in the newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.announce. The full report is the parent article to this message, and has the same subject. It has been cross-posted to alt.nocem.misc and alt.retromod. There has been a long-standing consensus among news administrators that binaries belong in binaries newsgroups, and not elsewhere. There also seems to be a consensus supporting the cancellation of large binaries in discussion groups as long as appropriate protocols are followed. In my opinion, the best way to distribute binary files is via ftp or the web. With the ready availablity of ftpmail servers, even uucp sites can retrieve binaries from ftp sites. However, if you really must post a binary to Usenet, please post it to an appropriate binaries newsgroup such as alt.binaries.misc. Then, if you like, post something in the appropriate discussion group telling people where to find the binary in the binaries group (a pointer to the binary). This will permit news administrators and users to decide for themselves whether to receive the binary files. Please direct public feedback to news.admin.net-abuse.misc and private feedback to myself at red@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us. If there is an unmoderated binaries group in the hierarchies that I scan, I don't know about it yet. Feel free to enlighten me. Best wishes, Dick -- Richard E. Depew, Munroe Falls, OH red@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us (home) It's over, and can't be helped, and that's one consolation, as they always say in Turkey, when they cut the wrong man's head off'' -- Charles Dickens
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ARMM-Report-130.a@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!neoucom.edu!redpoll!redReferences:
<ARMM-Report-130@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!neoucom.edu!redpoll!red Newsgroups: alt.retromod,comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot,comp.sys.amiga.audio,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.sports,rec.travel.marketplace Subject: Re: bincancel:4 large binaries:AR130:@@NCM Message-ID: <ARMM-Report-130.a@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us> References: <ARMM-Report-130@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 02:53:58 GMT From: red@redpoll.mrfs.oh.us (Richard E. Depew) Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.misc Organization: ARMM Cancellation Services Keywords: ARMM9