🚀 go-pugleaf

Angelo Campanella wrote:

> In article <3588F889.530D@ford.com> "Joseph S. Wisniewski" <jwisniew@ford.com> writes:
>
> >Bill Mulcahy wrote:
> >> As this subject is taboo for any government agency (we can't hurt the
> >> airline industry you know)  to talk about,
>
> >Nothing personal, Bill, but this isn't exactly true. The auto industry,
> >the real estate industry, and the agriculture industry (all of which
> >have substantial financial clout and political lobbying power) pressure
> >many federal agencies on aircraft issues. The auto industry has a long
>
> The real problem is the second stroke (?How do you fix it?).
> The first stroke is here (There is a problem). But the second stroke is
> made to appear to be excessively costly to the government that it is bane
> to fully recognize the existence of this proble.
>
> My solution recommendation has always been the install sensible building codes
> and grandfathering arrangements. The new code should prescribe house shell
> noise reduction minima. Th grandfathering should pertain to truth in sales,
> recommended structure improvement schemes and some honest damages awards.
>
> It will be a while before this all irons out.
>
> Ang.

FWIW, I do know of a project going on out at Virginia(Polytechnic?)
for active noise cancellation that will be used at Dulles hopefully.

Regards,
John