🚀 go-pugleaf

Lamey Teh AUK Guy Thou dismal-dreaming contagious cloud. Thou
bloodsucking enemy inveterate. Ye jabbered:  

> On Wed, 16 May 2007 08:40:10 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou fat-brained followers. Thou dolt.
>> Ye proclaimed:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 May 2007 02:02:29 GMT, Lamey Teh AUK Guy boggled at how
>>> lame the Kooks are these days, then wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2007 11:26:08 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:54:45 +0000 (UTC), blu <not@this.tm>
>>>>> boggled at how lame the Kooks are these days, then wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:f2b34v$rkp$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> < snip stuff not relevant to what I'm saying >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lamey, auk is an anarchy; there are no rules. You're spending an
>>>>>>> awful lot of fucked up mental power on overthrowing and
>>>>>>> replacing an anarchy that is not governed by any rules with an
>>>>>>> anarchy that is not governed by any rules.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's really fucking kooky of you, Lamey.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've a couple questions here, if I'm not kf'd by proxy,
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not. ;^)
>>>>>
>>>>>> that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Am I kf'd by proxy?
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) If auk is anarchy (which I fully support) then .. what is all
>>>>>> this? All these "rules" which, apparently, Lamey's run over and
>>>>>> disregarded.
>>>>>
>>>>> AUK is an unmoderated alt group. I would hope that the
>>>>> implications of that are completely obvious to you & Lamey both.
>>>>> ;^)
>>>>>
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> *could* pull out some dictionary and define anarchy, but that
>>>>>> shouldn't be necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> I certainly hope not!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, at this time, rather than make a half dozen posts, I'd like
>>>>>> to address some other issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a) In news:f2bbo3$hkk$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com you
>>>>>> (Kadaitcha Man) told Lamey to "FNAR" -could you define that for
>>>>>> me, please.
>>>>>
>>>>> No idea. Maybe someone else can help you with that one.
>>>>>
>>>>>> b) In news:u7hj1.s7f.17.1@news.alt.net there was some mention of
>>>>>> a website and the use of the word "we" (between Lamey and miguel,
>>>>>> I'm almost sure) that KMan took as Lamey "siding" with miguel.
>>>>>> The "we" in Lamey's post was referring to the one he and I have
>>>>>> been tossing together. If he collaborates with miguel on another
>>>>>> before this one's finished, I'll killfile him myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think KM simply misunderstood that one. I parsed it the same way
>>>>> as you've explained it here.
>>>>>
>>>>>> c) Meat Plow (of all people -thought I knew you better, bro)
>>>>>> news:u7v5u.jdd.17.1@news.alt.net:
>>>>>> has made a veiled threat that I would be "alienated" by Lamey's
>>>>>> actions. Lamey read this to me while I was reading a book in the
>>>>>> other room and I had to ask twice who posted that. If people I
>>>>>> considered "friends" alienate me because of Lamey's behavior,
>>>>>> he's right. They never were my "friends" to begin with and I'm
>>>>>> best knowing now, rather than later. Although I hope this doesn't
>>>>>> happen, in the event that it does, so be it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lamey has been jumping up & down on a bunch of peoples'
>>>>> hot-buttons, & several people who should really know better have
>>>>> let it get to them.
>>>>
>>>> Heh heh....Jus trollen guv.
>>>
>>> Yeah, exactly. You managed to poke one or two of mine, but hey,
>>> that's all part of the game, & if you haven't got a thick skin, WTF
>>> are you doing posting in a flame group? ;^)
>>>
>>>>> On the one hand, it's a tribute to lamey's skill as a troll, but
>>>>> OTOH, some of it's due to the fact that he's appearing to support
>>>>> some kooks (Rhonda & Cranston in particular) who've done some
>>>>> really nasty shit. AFAICT, much of the flack you're seeing is
>>>>> blowback from that, due to your support of Lamey.
>>>>
>>>> I support no one, I play. I don't need sides nor enemies. You are
>>>> all my friends and if KMan, you, Plow were ever to stop by
>>>> Colorado, You would be welcome here.
>>>
>>> Ditto for you if you were to come out here.
>>
>> That's very nice of him. But Colorado? What the fuck is there in
>> Colorado other than tourist resorts plonked into the middle of a
>> rattlesnake infested desert?
>
> You don't know Colorado well do you?

No, I don't, but let's not ruin good bullshit, eh. 

-- 
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
    AUK psychos and felons Lits
    #2 Cog in the Usenet Hate Machine Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

Asinus Stultissimus.