🚀 go-pugleaf

Lamey Teh AUK Guy Thou excellent grand tyrant of the earth. Thou is
spread of late into a goodly bulk. Ye advocated:  

> On Wed, 16 May 2007 09:24:17 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lamey Teh AUK Guy Thou dismal-dreaming contagious cloud. Thou
>> bloodsucking enemy inveterate. Ye jabbered:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 May 2007 08:40:10 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou fat-brained followers. Thou
>>>> dolt. Ye proclaimed:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2007 02:02:29 GMT, Lamey Teh AUK Guy boggled at how
>>>>> lame the Kooks are these days, then wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2007 11:26:08 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:54:45 +0000 (UTC), blu <not@this.tm>
>>>>>>> boggled at how lame the Kooks are these days, then wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f2b34v$rkp$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> < snip stuff not relevant to what I'm saying >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lamey, auk is an anarchy; there are no rules. You're spending
>>>>>>>>> an awful lot of fucked up mental power on overthrowing and
>>>>>>>>> replacing an anarchy that is not governed by any rules with an
>>>>>>>>> anarchy that is not governed by any rules.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's really fucking kooky of you, Lamey.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've a couple questions here, if I'm not kf'd by proxy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're not. ;^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) Am I kf'd by proxy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) If auk is anarchy (which I fully support) then .. what is
>>>>>>>> all this? All these "rules" which, apparently, Lamey's run
>>>>>>>> over and disregarded.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AUK is an unmoderated alt group. I would hope that the
>>>>>>> implications of that are completely obvious to you & Lamey both.
>>>>>>> ;^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> *could* pull out some dictionary and define anarchy, but that
>>>>>>>> shouldn't be necessary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I certainly hope not!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, at this time, rather than make a half dozen posts, I'd
>>>>>>>> like to address some other issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a) In news:f2bbo3$hkk$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com you
>>>>>>>> (Kadaitcha Man) told Lamey to "FNAR" -could you define that for
>>>>>>>> me, please.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No idea. Maybe someone else can help you with that one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> b) In news:u7hj1.s7f.17.1@news.alt.net there was some mention
>>>>>>>> of a website and the use of the word "we" (between Lamey and
>>>>>>>> miguel, I'm almost sure) that KMan took as Lamey "siding" with
>>>>>>>> miguel. The "we" in Lamey's post was referring to the one he
>>>>>>>> and I have been tossing together. If he collaborates with
>>>>>>>> miguel on another before this one's finished, I'll killfile
>>>>>>>> him myself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think KM simply misunderstood that one. I parsed it the same
>>>>>>> way as you've explained it here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> c) Meat Plow (of all people -thought I knew you better, bro)
>>>>>>>> news:u7v5u.jdd.17.1@news.alt.net:
>>>>>>>> has made a veiled threat that I would be "alienated" by Lamey's
>>>>>>>> actions. Lamey read this to me while I was reading a book in
>>>>>>>> the other room and I had to ask twice who posted that. If
>>>>>>>> people I considered "friends" alienate me because of Lamey's
>>>>>>>> behavior, he's right. They never were my "friends" to begin
>>>>>>>> with and I'm best knowing now, rather than later. Although I
>>>>>>>> hope this doesn't happen, in the event that it does, so be it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lamey has been jumping up & down on a bunch of peoples'
>>>>>>> hot-buttons, & several people who should really know better have
>>>>>>> let it get to them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heh heh....Jus trollen guv.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, exactly. You managed to poke one or two of mine, but hey,
>>>>> that's all part of the game, & if you haven't got a thick skin,
>>>>> WTF are you doing posting in a flame group? ;^)
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the one hand, it's a tribute to lamey's skill as a troll, but
>>>>>>> OTOH, some of it's due to the fact that he's appearing to
>>>>>>> support some kooks (Rhonda & Cranston in particular) who've
>>>>>>> done some really nasty shit. AFAICT, much of the flack you're
>>>>>>> seeing is blowback from that, due to your support of Lamey.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I support no one, I play. I don't need sides nor enemies. You are
>>>>>> all my friends and if KMan, you, Plow were ever to stop by
>>>>>> Colorado, You would be welcome here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ditto for you if you were to come out here.
>>>>
>>>> That's very nice of him. But Colorado? What the fuck is there in
>>>> Colorado other than tourist resorts plonked into the middle of a
>>>> rattlesnake infested desert?
>>>
>>> You don't know Colorado well do you?
>>
>> No, I don't, but let's not ruin good bullshit, eh.
>
> Ah, another "porky" ?

You learn quickly, glassslopper. 

-- 
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
    AUK psychos and felons Lits
    #2 Cog in the Usenet Hate Machine Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

Vacca stulta.