🚀 go-pugleaf

blu <not@this.tm> Thou presumptuous vassal. Thou hath a half face. Ye
demurred:  

> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:f2b34v$rkp$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>
> < snip stuff not relevant to what I'm saying >
>
>> Lamey, auk is an anarchy; there are no rules. You're spending an
>> awful lot of fucked up mental power on overthrowing and replacing an
>> anarchy that is not governed by any rules with an anarchy that is
>> not governed by any rules.
>>
>> That's really fucking kooky of you, Lamey.
>>
>
> I've a couple questions here, if I'm not kf'd by proxy, that is.
>
> 1) Am I kf'd by proxy?

Not that I'm aware of. Are you a fuckhead? If so, I'll organise it :)

> 2) If auk is anarchy (which I fully support) then .. what is all
> this? All these "rules" which, apparently, Lamey's run over and
> disregarded.

Erm... that would be tellin'. Too many free clues for those others who 
shouldn't have them. Sorry, you'll have to work it out without my help.

> I *could* pull out some dictionary and define anarchy,
> but that shouldn't be necessary.

Spare me, please.

> Also, at this time, rather than make a half dozen posts, I'd like to
> address some other issues.
>
> a) In news:f2bbo3$hkk$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com you (Kadaitcha
> Man) told Lamey to "FNAR" -could you define that for me, please.

Say it out loud, as a word.

> b) In news:u7hj1.s7f.17.1@news.alt.net there was some mention of a
> website and the use of the word "we" (between Lamey and miguel, I'm
> almost sure) that KMan took as Lamey "siding" with miguel.

No. Are you serious here? Lamey was trolling. Lamey was being trolled back, 
only harder. In my case, what I was doing to Lamey is called modus operandi.

> The "we"
> in Lamey's post was referring to the one he and I have been tossing
> together.

No. You either missed the original reference or your misread the post, or 
you misunderstood it, or you're confused, or you're mad. Lamey misread it or 
misunderstood it also.

Replay:

>>>>>>>>>> We need web pages for these awards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As it shall be. Stay tuned.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you see that word, "we"? Well, that was crasstoad executing
>>>>>>>> a coup d'�tat upon you, taking control of your "fun" and making
>>>>>>>> himself the puppeteer who pulls your strings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It may appear that way to you, But the website was started long
>>>>>>> before he chimed in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Focus that single, beady-eye of yours, which sits in the middle
>>>>>> of your steeply sloping forehead, on this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you see that word, "we"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure do.

Lamey did not write the words, "We need web pages for these awards", nor did 
you write them, so "your" website was not mentioned either by you or Lamey. 
As you can see from the replay, Lamey's attention had to be dragged from 
"your" website and back to the words that were actually being referenced.

The whole point being that, even though the idea was fully spelled out for 
him, he still missed it. Why is it so? Perhaps Lamey isn't as sharp a troll 
as he thinks he is. Who knows? Who cares? He had fun. Others had fun.

> If he collaborates with miguel on another before this one's
> finished, I'll killfile him myself.

lol

> c) Meat Plow (of all people -thought I knew you better, bro)
> news:u7v5u.jdd.17.1@news.alt.net:
> has made a veiled threat that I would be "alienated" by Lamey's
> actions. Lamey read this to me while I was reading a book in the
> other room and I had to ask twice who posted that. If people I
> considered "friends" alienate me because of Lamey's behavior, he's
> right. They never were my "friends" to begin with and I'm best
> knowing now, rather than later. Although I hope this doesn't happen,
> in the event that it does, so be it.

Nowt to do with me.

> Ok, that wasn't half a dozen, but those are the points I wanted to
> bring up.
>
> Maybe I'm not cut out to be an "auk-er"

Thin skins will do that. Then the thin-skinned people become whiners unless 
they unsubscribe.

> I get along with everybody, have a very hard time being hateful

I don't hate. I can't bring myself to feel it. I haven't felt it in three 
decades.

> (except to that mariposa dullcunt..)

I don't think you've given mariposa the credit he deserves. If you look past 
the all lowercase text and non-existent punctuation, he is highly 
intelligent and can construct an argument that stops dickheads and fuckheads 
dead in their tracks. Take some time to read and understand what he is 
saying and question your own opinion.

Alas, I too once thought mariposa was a boring fuck. I was wrong and I 
relented.

I am assuming mariposa is male. I've never bothered to check.

> and I don't do cliques well.

It isn't about cliques. Only you control your responses.

> When it comes time to choose sides, I generally walk away. That said,
> if I am unwelcome here because of my basic nature, fine. I'll leave
> without a tantrum. What I will *not* do is play follow the leader and
> be ugly toward someone just because so-and-so says to, I will *not*
> ignore someone because so-and-so says to.
>
> I know most of you are probably thinking "Who gives a red rat's ass?
> Who the fuck are you, anyway?" Well, who I am is me, blu. I live with
> Lamey, I love Lamey.. there are things Lamey does that make me shake
> my head in wonder at *why* he's doing them, but it's *HIM* .. not me.
> I do not wish to attempt to control what he does online or offline.
> (what a thankless task that would be..) I wish to be taken for myself.
>
> If that's possible, great, fine and wonderful. If not?
> .....
>
> ..............
>
> Oh well.

None of that has anything to do with me that I can see.

As it is, IMO, Lamey can be very funny, and people being funny is what I 
appreciate. However there's a fine line between trolling and being a 
fuckhead. Lamey didn't just cross it, he leapt over it and carried on 
running. Mister Plow was right to pull him into line.

I have no issue with you, blu. None. And if it helps, I had no idea you were 
involved with Lamey until you said something about living with him. So, I 
hope you take that as meaning, as far as I am concerned, your relationship 
with Lamey has nothing to do with me and has no bearing on how I interact 
with you or Lamey as individuals.

Re "individuals", cf "your responses". That's a free clue. It means I'll 
beat the shit out of Lamey for his responses and applaud you for yours. :) 

-- 
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
    AUK psychos and felons Lits
    #2 Cog in the Usenet Hate Machine Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

Te futueo et caballum tuum.