🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 17 May 2007 15:25:08 -0700, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 17 May 2007 15:09:08 -0700, kim <kimonnetNOSPAM@shaw.ca>
>wrote:
>>On Thu, 17 May 2007 02:19:49 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>wrote:
>>>On Wed, 16 May 2007 07:46:46 -0700, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> boggled
>>>at how lame the Kooks are these days, then wrote:

(snip)
>>>Oh, how cute - Cranston's playing the innocent.
>>
>>It's the MO.  
>>
>>1.  He'll engage in some stupid and nasty shit.  
>>2.  Play around in the ensuing bickering.  
>>3.  Give it a short respite.  
>>4.  Then when it's mentioned again he'll play stupid.  (ie: Jax, I
>>hardly knew ye). 
>>5.  When he's reminded of behavior he'll start the "no I didn't" ploy
>>and "prove it" manuever hoping that because he has no life and others
>>do that people will give up because of the time and patience factor.
>>Otherwise, it's a labor inducing endeavor to try to "win" this one
>>with gimpy.  
>>
>>Rinse and repeat.  
>>
>>Kim, apparently obsessed because I have his number 
>
>My little piggyfoot stalker Kim just can't stop stalking me!

It's too bad you can't get clients to stalk you to work for them.  

>I think she's an obsessed idiot! 

You think?  I guess I should get the thanks of a grateful nation for
having you actually think about something.  Can you use that energy to
think about working?  

>What can you expect, though, from somebody whose best usenet friend is
>Steve Chaney.

Hey, at least I keep my friends.  Can you say the same?

Kim 
come see the critters:  http://rats-rock.blogspot.com/