Article View: alt.security.pgp
Article #34Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: Perry E. Metzger
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:28
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:28
22 lines
1501 bytes
1501 bytes
res@colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) writes: >>As I remember, ITAR explicitly does not apply to technical data which has >>been published in publically available media (books, magazines, etc.). > >Two rather highly respected members of the net have made this claim, so >let's for a moment presume it is true. If a sympathetic congressman >could be convinced to place the source code into the Congressional Record, >would this not constitute publishing the work, and therefore divorce it >from any ITAR jurisdiction? Furthermore, I think the congressman would >be immune from prosecution, by constitutional edict, if this indeed would >ever become an issue. > >This would not, of course, in any sense address PKP's claim as a patent >holder, but it might lessen the chance of government interdiction. > >Comments? Why not just publish the source code in a magazine? -- Perry Metzger pmetzger@shearson.com -- Laissez faire, laissez passer. Le monde va de lui meme.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.222822.16635@shearson.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!shearson.com!snark!pmetzgerReferences:
<MOORE.92Dec16192825@defmacro.cs.utah.edu> <9212162343.AA24540@chaos.intercon.com> <1992Dec19.204449.18376@colnet.cmhnet.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp,sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!shearson.com!snark!pmetzger From: pmetzger@snark.shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger) Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Message-ID: <1992Dec22.222822.16635@shearson.com> Sender: news@shearson.com (News) Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization References: <MOORE.92Dec16192825@defmacro.cs.utah.edu> <9212162343.AA24540@chaos.intercon.com> <1992Dec19.204449.18376@colnet.cmhnet.org> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:28:22 GMT Lines: 22