Re: Status of DES, or "Is the DES Standard PD?"

Article View: alt.security.pgp

Article #41

#41

From: Ken Pizzini
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 19:39

13 lines
1199 bytes

In article <1992Dec11.075845.27376@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> spc@pineal.math.fau.edu (Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner) writes:
>  Can I use DES without having to pay royalties/licensing fees, etc, if I
>impliment the code myself?  

Yes, just don't export it outside of the US (well, Canada is okay) or
you'll be dealing with ITAR (International Trade in Arms Regulations).

>  And along those lines, is there validation data I can use to see if my
>implimentation of DES is 'up to spec'?
Why not just pick up one of many fine copies off the Net?  Why bother
rewriting it again?

		--Ken Pizzini

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec11.193929.6501@nwnexus.WA.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nwnexus!ken

References:

<1992Dec10.173645.147966@watson.ibm.com> <1992Dec11.030807.29118@shearson.com> <1992Dec11.075845.27376@cybernet.cse.fau.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp,alt.security,sci.crypt,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nwnexus!ken
From: ken@halcyon.com (Ken Pizzini)
Subject: Re: Status of DES, or "Is the DES Standard PD?"
Message-ID: <1992Dec11.193929.6501@nwnexus.WA.COM>
Keywords: (DES) and not (PGP or RSA)
Sender: sso@nwnexus.WA.COM (System Security Officer)
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service
References: <1992Dec10.173645.147966@watson.ibm.com> <1992Dec11.030807.29118@shearson.com> <1992Dec11.075845.27376@cybernet.cse.fau.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 19:39:29 GMT
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message