Article View: alt.security.pgp
Article #79Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: Rob Stampfli
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:44
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:44
18 lines
1352 bytes
1352 bytes
>As I remember, ITAR explicitly does not apply to technical data which has >been published in publically available media (books, magazines, etc.). Two rather highly respected members of the net have made this claim, so let's for a moment presume it is true. If a sympathetic congressman could be convinced to place the source code into the Congressional Record, would this not constitute publishing the work, and therefore divorce it from any ITAR jurisdiction? Furthermore, I think the congressman would be immune from prosecution, by constitutional edict, if this indeed would ever become an issue. This would not, of course, in any sense address PKP's claim as a patent holder, but it might lessen the chance of government interdiction. Comments? -- Rob Stampfli rob@colnet.cmhnet.org The neat thing about standards: 614-864-9377 HAM RADIO: kd8wk@n8jyv.oh There are so many to choose from.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec19.204449.18376@colnet.cmhnet.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!colnet!resReferences:
<MOORE.92Dec16192825@defmacro.cs.utah.edu> <9212162343.AA24540@chaos.intercon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp,sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!colnet!res From: res@colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Message-ID: <1992Dec19.204449.18376@colnet.cmhnet.org> Organization: Little to None References: <MOORE.92Dec16192825@defmacro.cs.utah.edu> <9212162343.AA24540@chaos.intercon.com> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:44:49 GMT Lines: 18