🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.security.pgp
Article #79

Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality

#79
From: Rob Stampfli
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:44
18 lines
1352 bytes
>As I remember, ITAR explicitly does not apply to technical data which has 
>been published in publically available media (books, magazines, etc.).

Two rather highly respected members of the net have made this claim, so
let's for a moment presume it is true.  If a sympathetic congressman
could be convinced to place the source code into the Congressional Record,
would this not constitute publishing the work, and therefore divorce it
from any ITAR jurisdiction?  Furthermore, I think the congressman would
be immune from prosecution, by constitutional edict, if this indeed would
ever become an issue.

This would not, of course, in any sense address PKP's claim as a patent
holder, but it might lessen the chance of government interdiction.

Comments?
-- 
Rob Stampfli  rob@colnet.cmhnet.org      The neat thing about standards:
614-864-9377  HAM RADIO: kd8wk@n8jyv.oh  There are so many to choose from.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec19.204449.18376@colnet.cmhnet.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!colnet!res
References: <MOORE.92Dec16192825@defmacro.cs.utah.edu> <9212162343.AA24540@chaos.intercon.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp,sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!colnet!res
From: res@colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
Message-ID: <1992Dec19.204449.18376@colnet.cmhnet.org>
Organization: Little to None
References: <MOORE.92Dec16192825@defmacro.cs.utah.edu> <9212162343.AA24540@chaos.intercon.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:44:49 GMT
Lines: 18