Article View: alt.security.ripem
Article #33Re: RSAREF and RIPEM now available via anonymous FTP
From: Glenn S. Tenney
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 08:07
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 08:07
51 lines
3069 bytes
3069 bytes
In article <1993Jan07.202702.20110@convex.com> hamrick@convex.com (Ed Hamrick) writes: > ... >If you agree that this printed book is exportable, then few would >disagree that a magnetic tape containing this source code is exportable. >If you agree that the source code on tape is exportable, then few >would disagree that the compiled version of this source code is exportable. > >Note all of the language in the regulations regarding pre-publication >review. When you read the regulations, they clearly indicate that once >information is publicly available (can be obtained in a library/bookstore), >then the cat is out of the bag and the information is exportable. I >believe that the Commerce Department, State Department, and NSA are >completely uninterested in preventing the export of anything that's >available to anybody at B. Dalton's bookstore. > >Anonymous ftp is fully equivalent to B. Dalton's bookstore or a >public library. > >Note that this discussion has nothing to do with the exportability >of integrated hardware/software crypto solutions. My premise is >primarily that the book containing the DES source code is freely >exportable because it is publicly available information. Sorry, but I agree that the book is exportable, but the mag tape would not be -- should be, but the Feds do NOT agree. I told this before, but... A friend of my was publishing a public domain Forth language system (books with full source code and disks). He was told (perhaps six or eight years ago) that he could NOT ship the disks to someone in the USSR wanting to buy them. He could ship the books. This was despite: The books and disks were available at a variety of bookstores (Stacey's in Palo Alto for one) and was public domain. This real-world experience completely contradicts your position that it has something to do with being publicly available. No, it has to do with an antiquated view from the Feds that books are ok, but once the code becomes machine readable it becomes a physical item very different from a book -- and therefore controllable. It seems to also be a question of: If you ask, they'll tell you NO, so don't ask. -- or -- Do it and wait to see if anyone throws you in jail. The problem is that if an officer of any corporation did either of those, the directors and shareholders would likely go after that officer for having done something VERY wrong. -- Glenn Tenney voice: (415) 574-3420 fax: (415) 574-0546 tenney@netcom.com Ham radio: AA6ER
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan8.080722.12176@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!tenneyReferences:
<1993Jan07.075317.15435@convex.com> <1993Jan7.083740.6128@qualcomm.com> <1993Jan07.202702.20110@convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.security.ripem,sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!tenney From: tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney) Subject: Re: RSAREF and RIPEM now available via anonymous FTP Message-ID: <1993Jan8.080722.12176@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <1993Jan07.075317.15435@convex.com> <1993Jan7.083740.6128@qualcomm.com> <1993Jan07.202702.20110@convex.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 08:07:22 GMT Lines: 51