Article View: alt.sources.d
Article #1759Re: Stupid reposting service (was Re: SLIP/getty/printers on Terminal Servers)
From: Bob Sutterfield
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1989 21:21
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1989 21:21
14 lines
1530 bytes
1530 bytes
If the source is something that I'm interested in, I already saw it the first time around because I read the groups discussing subjects that I'm interested in. If it's something that I'm not interested in, I don't mind (all that much) "n"ing over it in alt.sources, but it certainly adds to the clutter. I keep thinking things like "I thought I avoided looking at this traffic by not subscribing to those newsgroups discussing things I don't care about!" and "I already saw this once, right?". My main objection is to the cost of transporting the same stuff twice. It's measurable here, and substantial when multiplied by the number of non-NNTP edges in the network. I'd prefer not to have the reposting service. It's a disservice to me.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BOB.89Dec18162114@volitans.MorningStar.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bobReferences:
<10282@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> <5343@omepd.UUCP> <1989Dec17.041155.11834@sq.sq.com> <3dXJ028z75s201@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: alt.sources.d,news.admin Subject: Re: Stupid reposting service (was Re: SLIP/getty/printers on Terminal Servers) Message-ID: <BOB.89Dec18162114@volitans.MorningStar.Com> Date: 18 Dec 89 21:21:14 GMT References: <10282@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> <5343@omepd.UUCP> <1989Dec17.041155.11834@sq.sq.com> <3dXJ028z75s201@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> Sender: news@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Followup-To: alt.sources.d Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 14 In-reply-to: kim@uts.amdahl.com's message of 17 Dec 89 11:35:34 GMT