🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.sources.mac
Article #106

Re: ibm-compadible vs the Mac

#106
From: Tom Vilot
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 00:00
77 lines
3250 bytes
On Sun, 21 Sep 1997 00:12:17 GMT, 123 <b.chan@utoronto.ca> wrote:

>_q_@geocities.com wrote:
>
>> I want to put up a list of what people on the internet say is the
>> biggest
>> advantage of their computer over that of the other computer,
>> specifically
>> Windows/DOS vs the MAC. Please don't say it's more software availlable
>> or
>> it's more popular.
>
>   Apple is original, Windoze is just a cheap rip-off. 

Windows 3.1 was. Windows 95 is still something of a rip-off, but adds
new functionality and UI design.

NT is in no way, shape or form a rip-off of the Macintosh. The
Macintosh still does not have PMT/PM/SMP.

>Macs have a nice user interface. 

"nice" is a completely subjective, relative term. I could argue NT
4.0's user interface is "nice."

>you can rename the hard drive!!! 

I can rename the hard drive on NT/95.

>When you stick in a floppy disk it appears on-screen. 

Yep.

>Macs have a menubar location where all the menubars go, unlike windoze, 
>which does not have a menubar when nothing is open. 

This newsgroup has exhausted *this* debate. I won't even contribute...

>Windoze can take up 200 mb on your hard disk 

NT takes about 170. 95 takes maybe 100 to 120.

>and a mac
>with system 7.6 and a ton of extensions just takes up 100 mb. 

Uhm...does the word ROM mean anything to you?

>Programs
>for Windoze takes up a lot more RAM than programs for mac. 

Arguable.

>I am using a
>really cool Mac to type this up. 

I'm using a really cool NT box to type this up. Hasn't crashed since I
bought it in January.

>And if you want something neat, try
>doing weird things in the control pannels (you'll see the programmers
>sense of humor).

Uhm....okay. Whatever that means.

Personally, I'd rather *not* do weird things in the Control Panels on
a Macintosh; In doing so, I'd ensure it crashing.

Anyway, getting back to what _q_@geocities.com had requested:

I'm using NT. The biggest advantage I see right now is the pre-emptive
multitasking and protected memory. I can launch applications while I'm
waiting for applications I've launched. I can pretty much count on the
machine never crashing. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         tjv at indra dot com                              |            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <342447c5.25322843@news.indra.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <_q_-2009971558080001@yak-ts2-p15.wolfenet.com> <3424665D.9E452710@utoronto.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,556159a7771f64ee,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public
X-Google-Thread: fe071,556159a7771f64ee,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe071,public
X-Google-Thread: f6e7f,556159a7771f64ee,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6e7f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b5e3,556159a7771f64ee,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5e3,public
From: tjv@no.spam.com (Tom Vilot)
Subject: Re: ibm-compadible vs the Mac
Date: 1997/09/20
Message-ID: <342447c5.25322843@news.indra.com>
X-Deja-AN: 274359465
References: <_q_-2009971558080001@yak-ts2-p15.wolfenet.com> <3424665D.9E452710@utoronto.ca>
Organization: Indra's Net, Inc.  --  Public Access Internet.
Newsgroups: alt.sources.mac,aus.computers.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,francom.comp.macintosh