Article View: alt.sources.mac
Article #106Re: ibm-compadible vs the Mac
From: Tom Vilot
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 00:00
77 lines
3250 bytes
3250 bytes
On Sun, 21 Sep 1997 00:12:17 GMT, 123 <b.chan@utoronto.ca> wrote: >_q_@geocities.com wrote: > >> I want to put up a list of what people on the internet say is the >> biggest >> advantage of their computer over that of the other computer, >> specifically >> Windows/DOS vs the MAC. Please don't say it's more software availlable >> or >> it's more popular. > > Apple is original, Windoze is just a cheap rip-off. Windows 3.1 was. Windows 95 is still something of a rip-off, but adds new functionality and UI design. NT is in no way, shape or form a rip-off of the Macintosh. The Macintosh still does not have PMT/PM/SMP. >Macs have a nice user interface. "nice" is a completely subjective, relative term. I could argue NT 4.0's user interface is "nice." >you can rename the hard drive!!! I can rename the hard drive on NT/95. >When you stick in a floppy disk it appears on-screen. Yep. >Macs have a menubar location where all the menubars go, unlike windoze, >which does not have a menubar when nothing is open. This newsgroup has exhausted *this* debate. I won't even contribute... >Windoze can take up 200 mb on your hard disk NT takes about 170. 95 takes maybe 100 to 120. >and a mac >with system 7.6 and a ton of extensions just takes up 100 mb. Uhm...does the word ROM mean anything to you? >Programs >for Windoze takes up a lot more RAM than programs for mac. Arguable. >I am using a >really cool Mac to type this up. I'm using a really cool NT box to type this up. Hasn't crashed since I bought it in January. >And if you want something neat, try >doing weird things in the control pannels (you'll see the programmers >sense of humor). Uhm....okay. Whatever that means. Personally, I'd rather *not* do weird things in the Control Panels on a Macintosh; In doing so, I'd ensure it crashing. Anyway, getting back to what _q_@geocities.com had requested: I'm using NT. The biggest advantage I see right now is the pre-emptive multitasking and protected memory. I can launch applications while I'm waiting for applications I've launched. I can pretty much count on the machine never crashing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | tjv at indra dot com | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<342447c5.25322843@news.indra.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<_q_-2009971558080001@yak-ts2-p15.wolfenet.com> <3424665D.9E452710@utoronto.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,556159a7771f64ee,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public X-Google-Thread: fe071,556159a7771f64ee,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfe071,public X-Google-Thread: f6e7f,556159a7771f64ee,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6e7f,public X-Google-Thread: 10b5e3,556159a7771f64ee,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5e3,public From: tjv@no.spam.com (Tom Vilot) Subject: Re: ibm-compadible vs the Mac Date: 1997/09/20 Message-ID: <342447c5.25322843@news.indra.com> X-Deja-AN: 274359465 References: <_q_-2009971558080001@yak-ts2-p15.wolfenet.com> <3424665D.9E452710@utoronto.ca> Organization: Indra's Net, Inc. -- Public Access Internet. Newsgroups: alt.sources.mac,aus.computers.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,francom.comp.macintosh