Article View: alt.sources.mac
Article #73Re: ibm-compadible vs the Mac
From: John Stevens
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:00
65 lines
3159 bytes
3159 bytes
On 23 Sep 1997 01:53:29 GMT, Willie Yeo <yeo@pigeon.qut.edu.au> wrote: >news.sover.net> >Distribution: >Lance Togar (ltogar@msn.com) wrote: > I know Windows NT doesn't. But Windows 95 still *DOES*. Nope. Not according to what I've been learnig. DOS may be used to *launch* 95, and you can certainly run DOS apps *IN* 95, but 95 does not run *ON* DOS. >It still executes AUTOEXEC.BAT and >CONFIG.SYS on MS-DOS before passing to Win 95, if you don't believe, just >press <ESC> while the Windows 95 is starting logo. Certainly. DOS is being used as a loader for Win 95, but that doesn't prove that 95 runs *ON* DOS. I load Linux from DOS occasionally. But Linux doesn't run *ON* DOS. > You can even insert a line in AUTOEXEC.BAT to terminate before >even going into Windows 95. Sure. All you are doing is stopping DOS from loading Windows 95. >Half of my friends and programmers in fact >acknowledged it is a GUI above MS-DOS like Windows 3.11. Your programmers need to take a little better look at the techincal docs. >WIN32 SDK does >not prove nothing ... you look at the startup sequence, The startup sequence proves nothing, except about what happens at startup. >look at the file >naming convention 8 dot 3. I am forced to restrict myself to 8.3 when I save files on an MS-DOS file system while running Linux. This does not prove that Linux runs on DOS, it only proves that 8.3 is a restriction of the FAT file system. >You *STILL* have to use 8 dot 3 even if your >filename is longer then 12 characters, which is strictly MS-DOS at work. Nope. MS-DOS is the name of the Operating System. What you are seeing at work is the file system (a part of the OS, to be sure, but. . .), not the OS. >WinNT is *KWEL*, WinNT. . . urgh! Better than Windows 95, but even so. . . > but Win 95 plain is a joke. Well, I won't disagree with *THIS* statement! ;-> >'pre-emptive' >multitasking on Win 95 ? *rofl* It's a wonder why people do not move >across to Windows NT! 1) Cost? 2) Because people don't actually choose their OS, they run what comes pre-loaded on their system? John S.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrn62oeki.fdi.jstevens@samoyed.ftc.nrcs.usda.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<_q_-2009971558080001@yak-ts2-p15.wolfenet.com> <3424665D.9E452710@utoronto.ca> <342447c5.25322843@news.indra.com> <hubbach-2109971703000001@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <3425d296.2746960@news.sover.net> <6052id$2fa@dove.qut.edu.au> <6077ep$ekk@dove.qut.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,556159a7771f64ee X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public X-Google-Thread: f6e7f,556159a7771f64ee X-Google-Attributes: gidf6e7f,public X-Google-Thread: 10b5e3,556159a7771f64ee X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5e3,public X-Google-Thread: fe071,556159a7771f64ee X-Google-Attributes: gidfe071,public From: jstevens@samoyed.ftc.nrcs.usda.gov (John Stevens) Subject: Re: ibm-compadible vs the Mac Date: 1997/09/26 Message-ID: <slrn62oeki.fdi.jstevens@samoyed.ftc.nrcs.usda.gov> X-Deja-AN: 276281576 References: <_q_-2009971558080001@yak-ts2-p15.wolfenet.com> <3424665D.9E452710@utoronto.ca> <342447c5.25322843@news.indra.com> <hubbach-2109971703000001@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <3425d296.2746960@news.sover.net> <6052id$2fa@dove.qut.edu.au> <6077ep$ekk@dove.qut.edu.au> Organization: USDA/NRCS Information Technology Center Newsgroups: alt.sources.mac,aus.computers.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,francom.comp.macintosh