🚀 go-pugleaf

On Oct 29, 10:39 pm, Ultima Thule <PYTH...@THULE.COM> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:12:58 -0700 (PDT), usenet legends bobandcarole
> ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ????????? <squ1...@jp.popstarmail.org> wrote:
>
> >????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?????????
>
> >It is all about CONSENTING, if children want sex, why can't they have
> >it with adults like us?
>
> Direct from the pedophiles

It isn't our fault that we are Pædophiles and we hardly ever act on
it, and we appreciate your support Ultima Thule.

There is nothing wrong with giving a child pleasure.


                                  bobaлdcaяole
                               Copyright © 2010
                               all rights reserved
___
"Juicy shaved pussy that squirts" ™

"Bob wants to experiment with felching" ™

Arabic:
الحمد الله أن حلق غض كس النافورات

Ultima Thule schreef:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:12:58 -0700 (PDT), usenet legends bobandcarole
> ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ????????? <squ1rtz@jp.popstarmail.org> wrote:
>
> >????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?????????
> >
> >It is all about CONSENTING, if children want sex, why can't they have
> >it with adults like us?
>
> Direct from the pedophiles who don't forge B&C-right?
>
>
>
> Xref: news alt.support.boy-lovers:205730 alt.callahans:1066844
> alt.politics.homosexuality:1371027 aus.religion.islam:194805
> alt.religion.mormon:940247
> Path:
> nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!h7g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: usenet legends bobandcarole ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?????????
> <squ1rtz@jp.popstarmail.org>
> Newsgroups:
> alt.support.boy-lovers,alt.callahans,alt.politics.homosexuality,aus.religion.islam,alt.religion.mormon
> Subject: It should not be illegal to have sex with minors if they
> CONSENT! ?
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 14
> Message-ID:
> <13e54c4b-ba71-408c-86a6-52388bc37b81@h7g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.53.142.43
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1288372378 24003 127.0.0.1 (29 Oct 2010
> 17:12:58 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:12:58 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> Injection-Info: h7g2000yqn.googlegroups.com;
> posting-host=208.53.142.43;
> posting-account=c8MLTQoAAABTbgm7O0B1Trrte7hGKfvt
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; BecomeBot/2.2.1; MSIE 6.0
>  compatible; +http://www.become.com/webmasters.html),gzip(gfe)
>
> http://208.53.142.43/
>
> This is a Tor Exit Router
>
> Most likely you are accessing this website because you had some issue
> with the traffic coming from this IP. This router is part of the Tor
> Anonymity Network, which is dedicated to providing privacy to people
> who need it most: average computer users. This router IP should be
> generating no other traffic, unless it has been compromised.
>
>
>
> Tor sees use by many important segments of the population, including
> whistle blowers, journalists, Chinese dissidents skirting the Great
> Firewall and oppressive censorship, abuse victims, stalker targets,
> the US military, and law enforcement, just to name a few. While Tor is
> not designed for malicious computer users, it is true that they can
> use the network for malicious ends. In reality however, the actual
> amount of abuse is quite low. This is largely because criminals and
> hackers have significantly better access to privacy and anonymity than
> do the regular users whom they prey upon. Criminals can and do build,
> sell, and trade far larger and more powerful networks than Tor on a
> daily basis. Thus, in the mind of this operator, the social need for
> easily accessible censorship-resistant private, anonymous
> communication trumps the risk of unskilled bad actors, who are almost
> always more easily uncovered by traditional police work than by
> extensive monitoring and surveillance anyway.
>
> In terms of applicable law, the best way to understand Tor is to
> consider it a network of routers operating as common carriers, much
> like the Internet backbone. However, unlike the Internet backbone
> routers, Tor routers explicitly do not contain identifiable routing
> information about the source of a packet, and no single Tor node can
> determine both the origin and destination of a given transmission.
>
> As such, there is little the operator of this router can do to help
> you track the connection further. This router maintains no logs of any
> of the Tor traffic, so there is little that can be done to trace
> either legitimate or illegitimate traffic (or to filter one from the
> other). Attempts to seize this router will accomplish nothing.
>
> Furthermore, this machine also serves as a carrier of email, which
> means that its contents are further protected under the ECPA. 18 USC
> 2707 explicitly allows for civil remedies ($1000/account plus legal
> fees) in the event of a seizure executed without good faith or
> probable cause (it should be clear at this point that traffic with an
> originating IP address of
> tor-exit-proxy7-readme.formlessnetworking.net should not constitute
> probable cause to seize the machine). Similar considerations exist for
> 1st amendment content on this machine.
>
> If you are a representative of a company who feels that this router is
> being used to violate the DMCA, please be aware that this machine does
> not host or contain any illegal content. Also be aware that network
> infrastructure maintainers are not liable for the type of content that
> passes over their equipment, in accordance with DMCA "safe harbor"
> provisions. In other words, you will have just as much luck sending a
> takedown notice to the Internet backbone providers. Please consult
> EFF's prepared response for more information on this matter.
>
> For more information, please consult the following documentation:
>
> Tor Overview
> Tor Abuse FAQ
> Tor Legal FAQ
> That being said, if you still have a complaint about the router, you
> may email the maintainer. If complaints are related to a particular
> service that is being abused, I will consider removing that service
> from my exit policy, which would prevent my router from allowing that
> traffic to exit through it. I can only do this on an IP+destination
> port basis, however. Common P2P ports are already blocked.
>
> You also have the option of blocking this IP address and others on the
> Tor network if you so desire. The Tor project provides a web service
> to fetch a list of all IP addresses of Tor exit nodes that allow
> exiting to a specified IP:port combination, and an official DNSRBL is
> also available to determine if a given IP address is actually a Tor
> exit server. Please be considerate when using these options. It would
> be unfortunate to deny all Tor users access to your site indefinitely
> simply because of a few bad apples

See how easy it is to spot their 3rd grade level froggeries? It's just
another fanboi,
and God knows we've had dozens over the years. This one isn't even
worthy of
a reply. When you piss them off completely this is what you get. It's
more of a
sign that the plan is working and we count it as yet another victory.

I know of a few people who post to these groups w/knowledge of the Tor
Onion Router.
It should be easy to find the frogger and we already have a person{s}
of interest. BTW,Tor
can't protect you from malware as well as the method we employ of
chaining multiple
proxies. Tor is much easier to track also. I wouldn't recommend it to
the serious usenetizen.

___

                                  bobaлdcaяole
                               Copyright © 2010
                               all rights reserved

"I mean, it's not as if I'm bringing up "ass pounding" all the time,
or doing it right in front of you."~~ Deviant homosexual sodomite
Scott Allen Salberg, aka "Enos Penvy" aka "ScottyFLL" convicted
 of battery in Broward County Florida and currently running from the
humiliation of being outed as a convicted VIOLENT offender to usenet.

Image snap of Court and Conviction Record, Scott Salberg.
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u20/ninety7gt/Intelius.jpg

---
 #1 pedophile hunter: the wikisposure project.
  http://www.wikisposure.com/Alt.support.boy-lovers
 #5 ruiner of usenet.

Owner and trainer of Tom Evans aka "mad as a box of frogs"
 Tom Evans picture: http://yfrog.com/5zt0mevansj
"Publicity is publicity, good or bad it's STILL publicity"~ Alice
Cooper
"Did you plug the hole yet Daddy?"~~Malia Obama
Now I know why they call him tiger, "Eldrick Tont Woods"??   LMAO!! .
"There are 1000 or more reasons for a person INNOCENT of child
molesting to kill themselves"~ Arrested filth-monger frank mccoy
"A victory for one pornographer is a victory for all of the human
race"--pedophile "XXX"
"I mean, it's not as if I'm bringing up "ass pounding" all the time,
or doing it right in front of you."~~ deviant homosexual sodomite
Scott Allen Salberg, convicted of battery in Broward County Florida.
Image snap of Court and Conviction Record, Scott Salberg.
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u20/ninety7gt/Intelius.jpg

"You are not decent citizens, you are sick, degenerate filth. The
  fact that you attend church regularly proves it"~W.T.S.
                         <m14m @earthlink.net>

"I'd love to know how to say "FUCK YOU" in HTML language but
 I'll just stick to English at this point AND in plain text"~Jude
Alexander showcases his computer illiteracy to usenet
                             <cajun @deswamp.net>

Why should I have to press one for English??? This is AMERICA

On Oct 30, 7:39 am, Ultima Thule <PYTH...@THULE.COM> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:19:43 -0700 (PDT), usenet legends bobandcarole
> ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ????????? <squ1...@jp.popstarmail.org> wrote:
>
> >On Oct 29, 10:39 pm, Ultima Thule <PYTH...@THULE.COM> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:12:58 -0700 (PDT), usenet legends bobandcarole
> >> ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ????????? <squ1...@jp.popstarmail.org> wrote:
>
> >> >????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?????????
>
> >> >It is all about CONSENTING, if children want sex, why can't they have
> >> >it with adults like us?
>
> >> Direct from the pedophiles
>
> >It isn't our fault that we are P dophiles
>
> Perhaps not

Thank you for agreeing with us. Our Pædophilia really is a private
matter.

There is nothing wrong with giving a child pleasure.

                                  bobaлdcaяole
                               Copyright © 2010
                               all rights reserved
___
"Juicy shaved pussy that squirts" ™

"Bob wants to experiment with felching" ™

Arabic:
الحمد الله أن حلق غض كس النافورات