LIVING & NON-LIVING

Thread View: alt.support.cancer

5 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

5 total messages Started by Food-for-thought Sat, 11 Dec 1999 00:00

#165

Author: Food-for-thought
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 00:00

9 lines
1446 bytes



      " " "    THE SOUL IS LIVING  & THE BODY IS NON-LIVING.
      THE WHOLE PLAY IS ABOUT THE LIVING & THE NON-LIVING.
        THE HUMAN BIRTH IS CONSIDERED THE MOST ELEVATED.
                        THERE IS A CENSUS OF HUMAN BEINGS;
NO ONE COULD POSSIBLY COUNTS HOW MANY ANIMALS THERE ARE.
                             THE WHOLE  GAME IS ABOUT YOU.  " " "

Re: LIVING & NON-LIVING

#166

Author: Paul Murray
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 00:00

4 lines
1585 bytes

>       " " "    THE SOUL IS LIVING  & THE BODY IS NON-LIVING

The body is living and the soul is epiphenomena. There is *no* example ever
of a soul existing independent of  a body.

Re: LIVING & NON-LIVING

#159

Author: Robert Blaske
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 00:00

13 lines
2004 bytes

Why is your anger directed against religion, Paul?


"Paul Murray" <pmurray@nospam.bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:L8j74.8816$E4.17232@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> >       " " "    THE SOUL IS LIVING  & THE BODY IS NON-LIVING
>
> The body is living and the soul is epiphenomena. There is *no* example
ever
> of a soul existing independent of  a body.
>
>
>

Re: LIVING & NON-LIVING

#160

Author: p. blauw
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00

17 lines
1877 bytes

Robert Blaske wrote in message ...
>Why is your anger directed against religion, Paul?
>
>
>"Paul Murray" <pmurray@nospam.bigpond.com> wrote in message
>news:L8j74.8816$E4.17232@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>> >       " " "    THE SOUL IS LIVING  & THE BODY IS NON-LIVING

??

>> The body is living and the soul is epiphenomena. There is *no* example
>>ever of a soul existing independent of  a body.


Oh?
Both statements are incorrect.

Re: LIVING & NON-LIVING

#158

Author: p. blauw
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 00:00

45 lines
2830 bytes

Robert Blaske wrote in message ...
>Why is your anger directed against religion, Paul?
>
>
>"Paul Murray" <pmurray@nospam.bigpond.com> wrote in message
>news:L8j74.8816$E4.17232@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>> >       " " "    THE SOUL IS LIVING  & THE BODY IS NON-LIVING
>>
>> The body is living and the soul is epiphenomena. There is *no* example
>ever
>> of a soul existing independent of  a body.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Cooper <lemmings@microsoft.com>
To: p. blauw <p.blauw@hccnet.nl>
Date: dinsdag 28 december 1999 11:32
Subject: Re: LIVING & NON-LIVING


>"p. blauw" wrote:
>>
>> Robert Blaske wrote in message ...
>> >Why is your anger directed against religion, Paul?
>> >
>> >
>> >"Paul Murray" <pmurray@nospam.bigpond.com> wrote in message
>> >news:L8j74.8816$E4.17232@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>> >> >       " " "    THE SOUL IS LIVING  & THE BODY IS NON-LIVING
>>
>> ??
>>
>> >> The body is living and the soul is epiphenomena. There is *no* example
>> >>ever of a soul existing independent of  a body.
>>
>> Oh?
>> Both statements are incorrect.
>Please be a little more considerate then the original poster and don't
>reply to every newsgroup about the same irrelevant garbage


I happened to see this comment, and I know it is incorrect.
Is that inconsiderative?
And as far as I know I only posted this msg to alt.yoga...

OM Shanti

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads