🚀 go-pugleaf

undertow@news.vrx.net (Mad as a Box of Frogs) wrote in
news:h5ia6i$8ol$2@news.eternal-september.org: 

> In article <C6A2144C.4BEB3%cal1360@gmail.com>, cal 
> <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>
>>On 08/07/09 4:40 PM, in article 7e3hpqF2e3eleU1@mid.individual.net,
>>"Thomas Dehn" <thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote:
>>
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> 
>>> 
>>> cal wrote:
>>>> On 08/07/09 11:08 AM, in article 4a7c4390@news.x-privat.org, "T h e
>>>> M u n tD r e g g e r" <themuntdregger@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> (-:arl wrote:
>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:25 am, slunky <slu...@cryptobug.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> _/ (-:arl <carrrr...@gmail.com> wrote \_
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 12:32?am, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>> Some serious mental fuck from ASD who is stalking me.
>>>>>>>>> Seriously getting beyond
>>>>>>>>> a joke and I'm considering reporting to police who can do a
>>>>>>>>> criminal check on.
>>>>>>>> Do it dude.
>>>>>>>> Get this shit's to stop. It happens all the time here, a few
>>>>>>>> people accusing guys of all kinna shit. And If the usual
>>>>>>>> accuser's are not posting shit like this-- they're in with the
>>>>>>>> accuser, urging him on. Maybe that'll make 'em an accessory or
>>>>>>>> someth'n.? 
>>>>>>> Use google groups advanced search and look for posts by dawgie
>>>>>>> in alt.support.depression to see his trolling. Specifically,
>>>>>>> search for the
>>>>>>> term "masturbation" "dogsex" "cyberhivesex"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
SexwithDogshttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/
>>>>>>> browse_th re
>>>>>>> 
ad/t...http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/brow
>>>>>>> se_thread /t
>>>>>>> 
>>...http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/browse_thread
/
>>t..>>>>> .
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sexinvolving
>>>>>>> 
childrenhttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/bro
>>>>>>> wse_threa d/
>>>>>>> 
t...http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/browse_
>>>>>>> thread/t. ..
>>>>>>> 
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/browse_thre
>>>>>>> ad/t...ht tp
>>>>>>> 
://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.depression/browse_thread/t
>>>>>>> :... 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Masturbation (search
>>>>>>> result)http://groups.google.com/groups/search?lr=&safe=off&num=
10
>>>>>>> &q=mastur ba
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also note that dawgie is full of shit and has told so many lies
>>>>>>> that his
>>>>>>> nose is longer than pinnochio's which is proven by his countless
>>>>>>> contradictions. Such as his fake conditions:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1) Anorexia Nervosa
>>>>>>> 2) "Schitzofrenia"
>>>>>>> 3) Sociopathy
>>>>>>> 4) Narcissistic Personality Disorder
>>>>>>> 5) Depression
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All of which have been "diagnosed" by himself using short lists
>>>>>>> of criteria with no formal training while refusing to seek any
>>>>>>> help for these self-diagnosed "conditions" leading any sane
>>>>>>> person to believe that if these existed in him, they don't
>>>>>>> afflict him in any meaningful
>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Oh yeah, and he's a total shithead to boot!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -slunky
>>>>>> "Sex with dogs"
>>>>>> He fucked a dog.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Sex with children"
>>>>>> First link- No mention or reference to sex with children
>>>>>> *anywhere* 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2nd link- Again you've lost me.
>>>>>> There is ZERO reference to sex with childeren.... *again!*
>>>>>> slunky. Let alone dawgg having sex with them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 3rd link- One passing reference-
>>>>>> Two 9yr-olds having consensual sex with each other. One was the
>>>>>> 9yr_old dawgg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 4th link-- *Finally* there's something to do about sex with
>>>>>> children.
>>>>>> 2 9yr_old's having "sex" with each other.
>>>>>> Waddaa ya saying here slunky? You believe there are 9yr_old
>>>>>> pedo's? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Another thing.-- Which 9yr_old is the pedo?
>>>>>> Both are having sex with a 9yr_old.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Masturbation-  Your link lead to a google search of dawgg's
>>>>>> masturbation post's. Picking one at random-
>>>>>> The only mention of masturbation is the subject line= "I want to
>>>>>> Masturbate" And David wrote it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I quit reading after that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You just plain don't like this guy. One single link, out of all
>>>>>> you published, was valid. "Sex with dogs"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All of the rest were complete bullshit. You could not made a case
>>>>>> for pedophilia no matter how much it was stretched. Not even
>>>>>> close. Then there's the masturbation link. WTF do you think
>>>>>> you're doing!? Masturbation is never mentioned at all,
>>>>>> *anywhere*, in the thread. Except the subject line. And David
>>>>>> wrote that. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's looks to me, like you got some kinna beef with this guy,
>>>>>> that has *nothing* to do with pedophilia. You listed them
>>>>>> yourself. ======================
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also note that dawgie is full of shit and has told so many lies
>>>>>> that his
>>>>>> nose is longer than pinnochio's which is proven by his countless
>>>>>> contradictions. Such as his fake conditions:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1) Anorexia Nervosa
>>>>>> 2) "Schitzofrenia"
>>>>>> 3) Sociopathy
>>>>>> 4) Narcissistic Personality Disorder
>>>>>> 5) Depression
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All of which have been "diagnosed" by himself using short lists
>>>>>> of criteria with no formal training while refusing to seek any
>>>>>> help for these self-diagnosed "conditions" leading any sane
>>>>>> person to believe that if these existed in him, they don't
>>>>>> afflict him in any meaningful way.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Oh yeah, and he's a total shithead to boot!
>>>>>> =============================================
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's what this is really about. And you try sticking him with
>>>>>> the pedo label.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You're a pure piece of shit, low life slunky. One thing more i'd
>>>>>> like to remark on--
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ============
>>>>>> __"Also note that dawgie is full of shit and has told so many
>>>>>> lies that his nose is longer than pinnochio's which is proven by
>>>>>> his countless contradictions. Such as his fake conditions"
>>>>>> ===========
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The only thing here, is you, saying he is.
>>>>>> __You've proven yourself to be a liar right here.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (gee. i wonder if i should ever believe slunky again?)
>>>>> I've been watching Slunky's campaign against The_Dawgie and
>>>>> been feeling increasingly uncomfortable about the motivation
>>>>> behind it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If this poster is, (as slunky is clearly alleging), a pedophile
>>>>> who is using cover of ASD/ASH to gain sympathy for himself, then
>>>>> Slunky is quite right to alert others to whats going on and to
>>>>> hassle the guy out of here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, if its simply the case of bending the facts to fit some
>>>>> personal argument that slunky has with him, then its a
>>>>> particularly cruel and vindictive way to go about it. Pedophilia
>>>>> rightfully carries considerable stigma and making unfounded or
>>>>> unsubstantiated allegations has the capacity to cause serious
>>>>> damage and harm. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slunky either needs to substantiate his allegations or reatract
>>>>> and apologise. If he does neither, then the poster is welcome to
>>>>> my assistance in pursuing legal recourse.
>>>> 
>>>> i've been reading dawggie's posts since he showed up on ASD, and
>>>> can confirm independently of the google archive that carl's
>>>> assessment is accurate. there's no substantiation for calling him a
>>>> pedophile. 
>>> 
>>> Dawggie seems to think that "consensual"
>>> sex between a 40 year old and a 16 year old
>>> is perfectly fine, whereas sex with minors is not ok.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Some other people, including me, think that
>>> a 40 year old who has sex with a 16 year old
>>> is a pervert.
>>
>>what you and i think of it is unimportant. one thing it objectively
>>isn't is pedophilia, and one thing it objectively is is legal in both
>>their countries, where 16-year-olds and 40-year-olds can have
>>consentual sex without the quotation marks.
>>
>>> Slunky is an abuse survivor,
>>
>>i'm a childhood sexual abuse survivor too; this evokes no sympathy in
>>me. sure, we have triggers. we're all responsible for recognizing and
>>managing our triggers. we don't get to go berserk on people who've
>>broken no law like the guy in the "niagara falls" skit.
>>
>>> and the dawggie
>>> and slunky had disagreements
>>> about this topic in the past, which
>>> over several months then escalated.
>>
>>it's been a one-sided escalation. dawggie merely held his own in
>>quietly continuing to assert that there was nothing wrong with what he
>>and his younger friend did in the face of escalating name-calling and
>>hounding. his part consisted of refusing to be silenced and driven
>>away by two people (slunky and %) who have made it their special
>>project to defame, silence and drive him away, nearly two years after
>>they were the only ones who were still talking about it and all
>>dawggie was trying to do was talk peacefully about cars in aus.cars
>>and his depression-related issues in asd. 
>>
>>there's no doubt in my mind that this has been a case of unilateral
>>harassment and deliberate character assassination, and if called as a
>>witness i'll say so under oath.
> 
> 
> 
> Bravo sir ... clear thinking in the face of cyberbullying.
> 
> 
> <tips brim of Jays cap>
> 
> 

One netkkkop snitch kissing anothers bunghole.

-- 
Usenet lits score:

GIT-R-DONE!
NERD HERD NEWBIE
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
AUK Offishal Tinfoil Sombrero award 05/07
#20 Usenet asshole
#6 Lits Slut
#9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<Approved by Lionel>
Offishal Owner of undertow@news.vrx.net (Mad as a Box of Frogs)