🚀 go-pugleaf

the_dawggie wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2:27 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> the_dawggie wrote:
>>> On Dec 24, 2:04 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> humble.life wrote:
>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>> humble.life wrote:
>>>>>>> David wrote:
>>>>>>>> a turn-apple suprise and cherry leftovers & in a good mood
>>>>>>>> (with cran-berry sauce in the middle). Hope to write in a
>>>>>>>> straight line from now on.
>>
>>>>>>> all you need to do (although I appreciate the difficulty in
>>>>>>> realtime) is to work out when you're understood and the premise
>>>>>>> of what you are saying.
>>
>>>>>>> a lot of it cannot be understood by anyone who's outside of your
>>>>>>> mind, and contrary to psychic mediums belief, we can't read
>>>>>>> eachothers minds too far.
>>
>>>>>>> but some of your replies to me have been better of late
>>>>>>> (286-Bush etc) you seemed to engage without throwing in the
>>>>>>> random.
>>
>>>>>> lipid rate me's
>>
>>>>> you're a beater of the socially unwise you are
>>
>>>> i just mirror what i see
>>
>>> However what you see is what you think you see. Wasn't it a policy
>>> of "don't use "we""
>>> you came up with.
>>
>>> Hypocrite.
>>
>> show me where i said we , kiddie grabber
>
> Implied "we", I don't think the way you do, nor do I appreciate your
> insults.
>
> However you expext everyone to think like "you", and I actually don't
> like kids, they give me the screaming shites. And why the fuck
> you x-post your nosense? I'll never know.
>
> So, I win.

i never implied anything ,
your child chasing mind just hoped i did ,
i do whatever i feel like doing ,
i say what ever i feel like saying ,
don't like it , good , boy bumper