🚀 go-pugleaf

On Dec 24, 2:51 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the_dawggie wrote:
> > On Dec 24, 2:27 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> the_dawggie wrote:
> >>> On Dec 24, 2:04 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> humble.life wrote:
> >>>>> % wrote:
> >>>>>> humble.life wrote:
> >>>>>>> David wrote:
> >>>>>>>> a turn-apple suprise and cherry leftovers & in a good mood
> >>>>>>>> (with cran-berry sauce in the middle). Hope to write in a
> >>>>>>>> straight line from now on.
>
> >>>>>>> all you need to do (although I appreciate the difficulty in
> >>>>>>> realtime) is to work out when you're understood and the premise
> >>>>>>> of what you are saying.
>
> >>>>>>> a lot of it cannot be understood by anyone who's outside of your
> >>>>>>> mind, and contrary to psychic mediums belief, we can't read
> >>>>>>> eachothers minds too far.
>
> >>>>>>> but some of your replies to me have been better of late
> >>>>>>> (286-Bush etc) you seemed to engage without throwing in the
> >>>>>>> random.
>
> >>>>>> lipid rate me's
>
> >>>>> you're a beater of the socially unwise you are
>
> >>>> i just mirror what i see
>
> >>> However what you see is what you think you see. Wasn't it a policy
> >>> of "don't use "we""
> >>> you came up with.
>
> >>> Hypocrite.
>
> >> show me where i said we , kiddie grabber
>
> > Implied "we", I don't think the way you do, nor do I appreciate your
> > insults.
>
> > However you expext everyone to think like "you", and I actually don't
> > like kids, they give me the screaming shites. And why the fuck
> > you x-post your nosense? I'll never know.
>
> > So, I win.
>
> i never implied anything ,
> your child chasing mind just hoped i did ,
> i do whatever i feel like doing ,
> i say what ever i feel like saying ,
> don't like it , good , boy bumper

Still don't seem to get it, do you?

Well let's see posts you made complaining Jordy using "we", would
that be a start. Also stiring up David, me, and anyone else that does
not agree with you? it that a good start?

{troll - plonk}

--
Kipland.