🚀 go-pugleaf

On Oct 4, 12:13 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the_dawggie wrote:
> > On Oct 4, 11:00 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> the_dawggie wrote:
> >>> Brisbanetimes.com.AU
>
> >>> Child bully blitz. Letterman appears fucked.
>
> >>> Protection for under 16-s
> >>> Cyber bullies and schoolyar tormenters are more
> >>> likely to be prosecuted under an over-haul
> >>> of sexual harassment laws proposed to the'
> >>> Federal Government.
>
> >>> Folling a major rethink of the 25-year-old Sex
> >>> Discrimination Act anti harassment laws could be
> >>> extended to cover children under 16, a group not yet regarded
> >>> as facing a risk.
>
> >>> Blah blah
>
> >>> ... younger students harassed by anyone 16 or older would
> >>> have recouse the act for the first time.
>
> >>> So I'm right - I win, It goes on to say Such a change
> >>> which would cover cyber bulllying is seen as necessary
> >>> to remove a serious anomany.
>
> >>> So - you guys lose. I love it when that happens
>
> >> its got nothing to do with the law , its about morality ,
> >> its legal to shoot moose here but i still don't do it
>
> > I do like I feel like doing at the time within law.
>
> > I've already been told I have no morals, patrick migh have I've not
> > asked him.
>
> > Having no morals is within law boundaries.
>
> all my stuff is better than yours anyway so i don't care ,
> start a nation of deviants no matter to me ,
> because even if you could see what i mean you'd still be a jerk

Oh, IOW your arse farted and you need everyone to know?

--
Kip.