Article View: alt.support.diet
Article #1609Re: Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)
From: Robert Schuh
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 21:46
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 21:46
40 lines
2785 bytes
2785 bytes
Vegetarian wrote: > In article <ZXtrb.2169$%F.1648@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com>, JC Der Koenig wrote: > >> Look at your BMI. At 5'6" and 190, you are over 30, which is > >> categorized as obese. > >> > >> > > > > And if he is at 12% bodyfat? Still obese? > > > > Idiot. > > > > > > I highly doubt that having this pile of useless, worthless muscles is > doing anything good for his health. Having a BMI of 32 is bad. Being > fat at BMI 32 is horrible, being muscular at BMI 32 is not that great > either. > > Some dumbo bodybuilders think that by growing muscles, they are doing > themselves a favor. One needs to only look at their IQ to realize that > it is not the case and that they are not benefitting. > > John. WONDERFUL sweeping generalization there "John." Why is it that every anonymous asshole in Usenet thinks it is OK to be a bigot and to make ludicrous assumptions about entire groups of people? John, when you butch up and learn a thing or two about these topics come back, but for now, just keep fondling your neighbor's 5 year old son. -- Robert Schuh "Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality, the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors" - Nietzsche "The meek shall inherit nothing" - Zappa
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3FAEB5B6.DD84A748@robschuh.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.alt.net!usenetReferences:
<Wbhrb.6788$jy.3697@clgrps13> <Ydhrb.346965$6C4.158687@pd7tw1no> <Gltrb.17348$pK6.9547@lakeread02> <ZXtrb.2169$%F.1648@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com> <bom4r0$2pf$0@pita.alt.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public X-Google-Thread: 106a7e,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid106a7e,public X-Google-Thread: 10c314,fcbab283e86bd9b2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c314,public X-Google-Thread: 114e2b,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid114e2b,public X-Google-Thread: 109bf8,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid109bf8,public X-Google-Thread: 110137,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid110137,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-09 13:46:09 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.alt.net!usenet From: Robert Schuh <rob@robschuh.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.diet,alt.support.diet.low-calorie,alt.support.diet.low-carb,alt.support.diet.low-fat,calgary.general,misc.fitness.weights Subject: Re: Atkins = ? (should i start this again?) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 14:46:30 -0700 Organization: Frank Booth Fan Club Lines: 42 Message-ID: <3FAEB5B6.DD84A748@robschuh.com> References: <Wbhrb.6788$jy.3697@clgrps13> <Ydhrb.346965$6C4.158687@pd7tw1no> <Gltrb.17348$pK6.9547@lakeread02> <ZXtrb.2169$%F.1648@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com> <bom4r0$2pf$0@pita.alt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en