Article View: alt.support.diet
Article #1617Re: Atkins = ? (should i start this again?)
From: Steven C (Doktersteve)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:04
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:04
59 lines
3557 bytes
3557 bytes
"revek" <tanirevek@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bom76l$1fjjob$1@ID-190183.news.uni-berlin.de... > "Patricia Heil" <pjayheil@erols.com> wrote in message > news:3FAE48AD.675B4C1@erols.com... > > I recently posted here that one of my concerns with Atkins is > > that 68% of those who tried it, in one clinical study, wound up > > constipated. > > And how long was this study? Did they ever get past the first phase? > That is kind of important, as you move past induction, which is > supposed to last 2 weeks only, you are supposed to begin eating more > vegetables, and less of other things. Two weeks is not long enough to > give you long term problems, and any study that focuses on the > begining stage as if it is the whole diet is worthless as a source of > information. > > and i have read that some people's initial phase lasts longer based on how much they want or need to loose. Is that true? > That is bad for long term health. Removing fiber > > from the diet demonstrably leads to colo-rectal cancer, the > > third leading cancer killer behind lung cancer and prostate cancer, > > and therefore the #2 preventable killer cancer. > that is a very good point. i am sure that a proponent of the diet could bring up something to debate you on this, but i havent seen anything of that sort yet. > Atkins goes out of it's way to insist on lots of fiber-- and in the > two week beiginning phase if you do not eat enough fiberous > vegetables, you are supposed to ease the *temporary* situation with > fiber supplements. > > So does that prevent the above? > I even have > > anecdotal evidence, a friend of mine was unable to tolerate any > > fiber in her diet and she died about 20 years ago from colo-rectal > > cancer at the age of only about 40. > > I'm terribly sorry for your loss. But really you are arguing a > strawman. Atkins is not a no fiber/ no veggie diet. > > revek > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 11/3/2003 > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mKzrb.10339$jy.4609@clgrps13>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!xmission!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!clgrps13.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Wbhrb.6788$jy.3697@clgrps13> <3FAE48AD.675B4C1@erols.com> <bom76l$1fjjob$1@ID-190183.news.uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public X-Google-Thread: 106a7e,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid106a7e,public X-Google-Thread: 114e2b,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid114e2b,public X-Google-Thread: 109bf8,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid109bf8,public X-Google-Thread: 110137,1e6c94c09f6752af X-Google-Attributes: gid110137,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-09 15:04:51 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!xmission!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!clgrps13.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Steven C \(Doktersteve\)" <real_doktersteve@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.diet,alt.support.diet.low-calorie,alt.support.diet.low-carb,alt.support.diet.low-fat,calgary.general References: <Wbhrb.6788$jy.3697@clgrps13> <3FAE48AD.675B4C1@erols.com> <bom76l$1fjjob$1@ID-190183.news.uni-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Atkins = ? (should i start this again?) Lines: 61 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 Message-ID: <mKzrb.10339$jy.4609@clgrps13> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:04:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.222.207.15 X-Trace: clgrps13 1068419090 66.222.207.15 (Sun, 09 Nov 2003 16:04:50 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 16:04:50 MST