🚀 go-pugleaf

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message 
news:6261b861145f7c0fc54449b84c265f04@pseudo.borked.net...
> "freedom" <aboutken@KRPaboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:

>>----->>>    Nice idea, completely naive. The FBI has NO jurisdiction and 
>>has MUCH
>>>bigger fish to fry. Sorry - when you have an internet stalker you are 
>>>100%
>>>on your own.
>>>Now as to shutting off my computer and walking away from the internet, I
>>>can't because my business is heavily dependent on the internet, which is 
>>>WHY
>>>the harassment, to destroy my business.  Few people realize how little 
>>>legal
>>>protection we have for maniacs like this.
>>
>>Now tell her the full story....that a simple apology would make
>>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com go away, and would end your so-called
>>"problems"....at least from me exposing you on your lies.

> This isn't entirely true according to your site.

> "I, in turn, will remove the text of these pages and replace it with the
> text of his apology, plus a link to his URL.  I will retain ownership of
> this domain, and will continue to proactively include the domain in search
> engines. If Ken steps out of compliance with any of the above, all pages
> will immediately be restored. "

> The "any of the above" includes: "5. Ken will cease his abusive behavior."
> This is a trifle vague.  Who decides what is abusive behavior?  If he gets
> into an argument with someone, do the pages get slapped back up?

> I think a more equitable tradeoff might be if ownership of the domain in
> question is turned over to him.


    Yeah right... And then the NEW about Ken website???