🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mark K. Dildo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message 
news:epidndLEqf_TLDTeRVn-jQ@megapath.net...
>>
>> HINTY HINT MARKIE:
>>>>>> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
>>>>>> The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
>>>>>> is unverified.
>>
>>>> Some people, I would imagine, might chain through up to half a dozen
>>>> remailers depending on their security needs.  In my case, I'm not doing
>>>> espionage or anything like that....simply looking to post without
>>>> people like Ken learning my ISP and flooding the abuse desk with
>>>> complaints.
>>
>>> Gee, you don't think he'd do *that do you?
>>
>>     If he is suffereing  from Paranoia................
>>
>>>>>There is nothing to "investigate" far as the anonymous messages are
>>>>>concerned. Nobody can determine who's sending them. That's the fucking
>>>>>*point of using an anonymizer.
>>>>
>>>> Except for cases when someone is forging through a remailer, and
>>>> forgets to switch back to their own ID.  Then switches back and sends
>>>> the SAME message eight hours later.  :)
>>>
>>> Well, there is *that.
>>
>> No Markie. BUT you are too STGUPID to know "that."
>>
>>> I mean in the way he makes so much of the headers. There's just "there"
>>> there.
>>
>>     Mark IF you had the IQ to know how to read headers or have ANY even
>>     tiny
>> remote idea of any part of their significance you might realize that 
>> there
>> IS some "there" there!
>
> Look, twit boy, I actually run my own mail server. I have my own nntp
> server chugging along over on that machine right over there. I write
> scripts to process headers. I have the RFCs that *define* headers on
> Usenet et al.

That makes your actions even worse.  DELIBERATE!