🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mark K. Dildo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message 
news:4JmdnfGJGeNZWzXe4p2dnA@megapath.net...

RTEPOLYING to his GOD  DAVID MOORE as:

>  CAPTAIN freedom" <aboutken@KRPaboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

HINTY HINT MARKIE:
>>>> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
>>>> The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
>>>> is unverified.

>> Some people, I would imagine, might chain through up to half a dozen
>> remailers depending on their security needs.  In my case, I'm not doing
>> espionage or anything like that....simply looking to post without people
>> like Ken learning my ISP and flooding the abuse desk with complaints.

> Gee, you don't think he'd do *that do you?

    If he is suffereing  from Paranoia................

>>>There is nothing to "investigate" far as the anonymous messages are
>>>concerned. Nobody can determine who's sending them. That's the fucking
>>>*point of using an anonymizer.
>>
>> Except for cases when someone is forging through a remailer, and forgets
>> to switch back to their own ID.  Then switches back and sends the SAME
>> message eight hours later.  :)
>
> Well, there is *that.

No Markie. BUT you are too STGUPID to know "that."

> I mean in the way he makes so much of the headers. There's just "there"
> there.

    Mark IF you had the IQ to know how to read headers or have ANY even tiny 
remote idea of any part of their significance you might realize that there 
IS some "there" there!
For eample as a MORON you don't know WHAT significance there is in REFERENCE 
MESSAGE ID's have. Your eyes begin to glaze over and your drooling down the 
front of your shirt starts. I know you'll never uinderstand this because it 
is so FAR over that pointy little head of yours...  You see DIPSHIT  - - IF 
this was an ORIGINAL post from me where I just SLIPPED (as YOU believe) and 
posted the same FORGERY from MY system  there would be NO -- see if you can 
folow this .. there would be NO message reference ID because it would be an 
ORIGINAL post..  Bet you can't understand that. NOT A CHANCE IN HELL  you'll 
grasp it.  More likely a goldfish could understand the theory of relativity 
Mark.

    Not to mention that IF you look at MY post and TOTALLY put reference ID 
and complicated HEADERS out of the discussion - and you look at the actual 
GOOGLE archives you just MIGHT see from the formatting that it was a REPLY 
to a post that was mad earlier.  Oh shit ypou can't understanbd message 
FORMATTING either! Here I am pissing in the wind again with an IGNORAMUS!







>>>DUH.
>>>
>>>The funniest thing is that if it is Moore sending the anonymous
>>>messages, Pangborn's his puppet, dancing to Moore's tune every time
>>>Moore pulls his strings.
>>>
>>>If it is Moore, my hat's off to him. I've never seen someone so utterly
>>>reduce an opponent on Usenet to the status of trained poodle...
>>
>> LOL....thanks....I think.
>
> <G>
>
>> No, I'm not making the forgeries.  Of course, I could be lying, because
>> as you pointed out, there is no real way to determine who the sender is
>> on any remailed message (unless it's signed with PGP.)  I suppose if I
>> were "put on the witness stand" I would have to offer the following on
>> my behalf:
>>
>> 1. I've never had any beef or quarrel with anyone in the atheist group,
>> or any of the other groups which have been forged
>
> While the forges here in a.a. started after he, himself, under his own
> name and account, had a quite nasty run in with folks in a.a.
>
> Funny that huh?
>
>> 2. On at least one occasion, Pangborn was proven to have forged.  (This
>> was actually the forgery of you, where he sent the same message 8 hours
>> later from his Verizon:
>> http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html)
>
> Oh I remember that one. <g>
>
>> 3. He's been caught lying hundreds of times.
>>
>> Of course, he can argue that I use remailers, the forger uses remailers.
>> By this logic, every time a pyramid scheme or phishing attack originates
>> from yahoo.com, all 100 million Yahoo users are responsible.
>
> Yeah, the use of remailers tells us nothing one way or the other. The
> things he finds "significant" are just... strange.
> -- 
> Mark K. Bilbo
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> "We need everything you've got"
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2726554C
>
> Forgotten Already
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1233272C
>
> Feds are treating Louisiana like enemy
>
> "...it may be that they may have written us off."
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?O21E51C1C
>
> http://www.nola.com
>