🚀 go-pugleaf

In <N1fqf.629$2B5.462@trnddc01>, " KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

> 
> "Mark K. Dildo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
> news:4JmdnfGJGeNZWzXe4p2dnA@megapath.net...
> 
> RTEPOLYING to his GOD  DAVID MOORE as:
> 
>>  CAPTAIN freedom" <aboutken@KRPaboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> HINTY HINT MARKIE:
>>>>> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
>>>>> The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
>>>>> is unverified.
> 
>>> Some people, I would imagine, might chain through up to half a dozen
>>> remailers depending on their security needs.  In my case, I'm not doing
>>> espionage or anything like that....simply looking to post without
>>> people like Ken learning my ISP and flooding the abuse desk with
>>> complaints.
> 
>> Gee, you don't think he'd do *that do you?
> 
>     If he is suffereing  from Paranoia................
> 
>>>>There is nothing to "investigate" far as the anonymous messages are
>>>>concerned. Nobody can determine who's sending them. That's the fucking
>>>>*point of using an anonymizer.
>>>
>>> Except for cases when someone is forging through a remailer, and
>>> forgets to switch back to their own ID.  Then switches back and sends
>>> the SAME message eight hours later.  :)
>>
>> Well, there is *that.
> 
> No Markie. BUT you are too STGUPID to know "that."
> 
>> I mean in the way he makes so much of the headers. There's just "there"
>> there.
> 
>     Mark IF you had the IQ to know how to read headers or have ANY even
>     tiny
> remote idea of any part of their significance you might realize that there
> IS some "there" there!

Look, twit boy, I actually run my own mail server. I have my own nntp
server chugging along over on that machine right over there. I write
scripts to process headers. I have the RFCs that *define* headers on
Usenet et al.

I kinda know how to read headers.

> For eample as a MORON you don't know WHAT significance there is in
> REFERENCE MESSAGE ID's have. Your eyes begin to glaze over and your
> drooling down the front of your shirt starts. I know you'll never
> uinderstand this because it is so FAR over that pointy little head of
> yours...  You see DIPSHIT  - - IF this was an ORIGINAL post from me where
> I just SLIPPED (as YOU believe) and posted the same FORGERY from MY system
>  there would be NO -- see if you can folow this .. there would be NO
> message reference ID because it would be an ORIGINAL post..  Bet you can't
> understand that. NOT A CHANCE IN HELL  you'll grasp it.  More likely a
> goldfish could understand the theory of relativity Mark.
> 
>     Not to mention that IF you look at MY post and TOTALLY put reference
>     ID
> and complicated HEADERS out of the discussion - and you look at the actual
> GOOGLE archives you just MIGHT see from the formatting that it was a REPLY
> to a post that was mad earlier.  Oh shit ypou can't understanbd message
> FORMATTING either! Here I am pissing in the wind again with an IGNORAMUS!
 

YAWN.

Hey, site the relevant RFC how 'bout?



-- 
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
So much for that "storm of the century" excuse
http://makeashorterlink.com/?A3992495C

NO held hostage by oil corporations, 
ANWR demanded as ransom
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J5C92195C

White House balks at spending on US citizens,
needs more billions for Iraq!
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1D93595C

(Tell me again how much we spent bailing out the S&Ls?)

http://www.nola.com