Thread View: alt.support.hearing-loss
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by The Roving Reporter
Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:36
NEUROSCIENCE: Brain Wiring for Human Language
Author: The Roving Reporter
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:36
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:36
54 lines
3928 bytes
3928 bytes
From the newsroom of the Scientific American, Wednesday, October 3, 2001..... NEUROSCIENCE Brain Wiring for Human Language Scientists have long been interested how the deaf process signed languages in the brain. Understanding that activity could shed light on whether the brain harbors specialized structures for decoding linguistic patterns in general - regardless of how they are conveyed. In fact, a new study published in Tuesday's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science ( http://www.pnas.org/) suggests that the brain does have such wiring, challenging the idea that speech and sound are vital for human language. Laura Ann Petitto (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/petitto.html) and Robert Zatorre (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/~zlab/) of McGill University and their colleagues base their conclusions on a series of experiments (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/PNASmovies.html) using positron emission tomography (PET) brain scans of 11 profoundly deaf people and 10 hearing people. Earlier work had demonstrated that deaf people processing signed sentences used mostly their left hemispheres, just as hearing people parsing spoken language did. But the new study found that in addition, both groups rely on identical brain structures for similar tasks. Petitto and Zatorre's team discovered that deaf people searching for and retrieving signs showed greater activity in the left inferior frontal cortex-the same region that lights up in PET scans when hearing people rack their brains for words. And when the deaf subjects in the study processed meaningless grammatical hand movements, they showed greater blood flow in the planum temporale. In hearing individuals, this brain region handles the spoken equivalent-incoming meaningless syllables (such as ba, ta, da and pa) from which all words are made. The researchers were particularly stunned by this activity in the planum temporale among the deaf. For more than 100 years, scientists have thought that the tissues there-which receive neural projections from the ears-exclusively processed sounds, and nothing else. The puzzling finding has led Petitto and Zatorre to propose that perhaps areas of the brain once viewed as devoted to sounds actually contain different types of cells capable of responding to the patterns of natural language in any form. "Such neural specialization for aspects of language patterning appears to be neurally unmodifiable in so far as languages with radically different sensory modalities such as speech and sign are processed at similar brain sites," the authors write, "while, at the same time, the neural pathways for expressing and perceiving natural language appear to be neurally highly modifiable." -Kristin Leutwyler. � 1996-2001 Scientific American, Inc.
Re: NEUROSCIENCE: Brain Wiring for Human Language
Author: Kevin Balaam
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 05:29
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 05:29
73 lines
4660 bytes
4660 bytes
I recently saw on TV that post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can affect the front left temporal lobe area. The report stated that this part of the brain is involved in language. Is it the same as the areas mentioned in the article below? -- / Kevin Remove thefish from bigpond to reply. "The Roving Reporter" <tlshell@concentric.net> wrote in message news:mo8mrt4pmeis008tkr8beg71tf7er3poff@4ax.com... > From the newsroom of the Scientific American, Wednesday, October 3, > 2001..... > > NEUROSCIENCE > > Brain Wiring for Human Language > > Scientists have long been interested how the deaf process signed > languages in the brain. Understanding that activity could shed light > on whether the brain harbors specialized structures for decoding > linguistic patterns in general - regardless of how they are conveyed. > In fact, a new study published in Tuesday's issue of the Proceedings > of the National Academy of Science ( http://www.pnas.org/) suggests > that the brain does have such wiring, challenging the idea that speech > and sound are vital for human language. Laura Ann Petitto > (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/petitto.html) and Robert > Zatorre (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/~zlab/) of McGill University and > their colleagues base their conclusions on a series of experiments > (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/PNASmovies.html) using > positron emission tomography (PET) brain scans of 11 profoundly deaf > people and 10 hearing people. > > Earlier work had demonstrated that deaf people processing signed > sentences used mostly their left hemispheres, just as hearing people > parsing spoken language did. But the new study found that in addition, > both groups rely on identical brain structures for similar tasks. > Petitto and Zatorre's team discovered that deaf people searching for > and retrieving signs showed greater activity in the left inferior > frontal cortex-the same region that lights up in PET scans when > hearing people rack their brains for words. And when the deaf subjects > in the study processed meaningless grammatical hand movements, they > showed greater blood flow in the planum temporale. In hearing > individuals, this brain region handles the spoken equivalent-incoming > meaningless syllables (such as ba, ta, da and pa) from which all words > are made. > > The researchers were particularly stunned by this activity in the > planum temporale among the deaf. For more than 100 years, scientists > have thought that the tissues there-which receive neural projections > from the ears-exclusively processed sounds, and nothing else. The > puzzling finding has led Petitto and Zatorre to propose that perhaps > areas of the brain once viewed as devoted to sounds actually contain > different types of cells capable of responding to the patterns of > natural language in any form. "Such neural specialization for aspects > of language patterning appears to be neurally unmodifiable in so far > as languages with radically different sensory modalities such as > speech and sign are processed at similar brain sites," the authors > write, "while, at the same time, the neural pathways for expressing > and perceiving natural language appear to be neurally highly > modifiable." > > -Kristin Leutwyler. > > � 1996-2001 Scientific American, Inc.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads