🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.support.hearing-loss
2 messages
2 total messages Started by The Roving Reporter Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:36
NEUROSCIENCE: Brain Wiring for Human Language
#119
Author: The Roving Reporter
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:36
54 lines
3928 bytes
From the newsroom of the Scientific American, Wednesday, October 3,
2001.....

NEUROSCIENCE

Brain Wiring for Human Language

Scientists have long been interested how the deaf process signed
languages in the brain. Understanding that activity could shed light
on whether the brain harbors specialized structures for decoding
linguistic patterns in general - regardless of how they are conveyed.
In fact, a new study published in Tuesday's issue of the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Science ( http://www.pnas.org/) suggests
that the brain does have such wiring, challenging the idea that speech
and sound are vital for human language. Laura Ann Petitto
(http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/petitto.html) and Robert
Zatorre (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/~zlab/) of McGill University and
their colleagues base their conclusions on a series of experiments
(http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/PNASmovies.html) using
positron emission tomography (PET) brain scans of 11 profoundly deaf
people and 10 hearing people.

Earlier work had demonstrated that deaf people processing signed
sentences used mostly their left hemispheres, just as hearing people
parsing spoken language did. But the new study found that in addition,
both groups rely on identical brain structures for similar tasks.
Petitto and Zatorre's team discovered that deaf people searching for
and retrieving signs showed greater activity in the left inferior
frontal cortex-the same region that lights up in PET scans when
hearing people rack their brains for words. And when the deaf subjects
in the study processed meaningless grammatical hand movements, they
showed greater blood flow in the planum temporale. In hearing
individuals, this brain region handles the spoken equivalent-incoming
meaningless syllables (such as ba, ta, da and pa) from which all words
are made.

The researchers were particularly stunned by this activity in the
planum temporale among the deaf. For more than 100 years, scientists
have thought that the tissues there-which receive neural projections
from the ears-exclusively processed sounds, and nothing else. The
puzzling finding has led Petitto and Zatorre to propose that perhaps
areas of the brain once viewed as devoted to sounds actually contain
different types of cells capable of responding to the patterns of
natural language in any form. "Such neural specialization for aspects
of language patterning appears to be neurally unmodifiable in so far
as languages with radically different sensory modalities such as
speech and sign are processed at similar brain sites," the authors
write, "while, at the same time, the neural pathways for expressing
and perceiving natural language appear to be neurally highly
modifiable."

-Kristin Leutwyler.

� 1996-2001 Scientific American, Inc.
Re: NEUROSCIENCE: Brain Wiring for Human Language
#120
Author: Kevin Balaam
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 05:29
73 lines
4660 bytes
I recently saw on TV that post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can
affect the front left temporal lobe area. The report stated that this
part of the brain is involved in language. Is it the same as the areas
mentioned in the article below?

--
/ Kevin
Remove thefish from bigpond to reply.

"The Roving Reporter" <tlshell@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:mo8mrt4pmeis008tkr8beg71tf7er3poff@4ax.com...
> From the newsroom of the Scientific American, Wednesday, October 3,
> 2001.....
>
> NEUROSCIENCE
>
> Brain Wiring for Human Language
>
> Scientists have long been interested how the deaf process signed
> languages in the brain. Understanding that activity could shed light
> on whether the brain harbors specialized structures for decoding
> linguistic patterns in general - regardless of how they are
conveyed.
> In fact, a new study published in Tuesday's issue of the Proceedings
> of the National Academy of Science ( http://www.pnas.org/) suggests
> that the brain does have such wiring, challenging the idea that
speech
> and sound are vital for human language. Laura Ann Petitto
> (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/petitto.html) and Robert
> Zatorre (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/~zlab/) of McGill University
and
> their colleagues base their conclusions on a series of experiments
> (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/petitto/PNASmovies.html) using
> positron emission tomography (PET) brain scans of 11 profoundly deaf
> people and 10 hearing people.
>
> Earlier work had demonstrated that deaf people processing signed
> sentences used mostly their left hemispheres, just as hearing people
> parsing spoken language did. But the new study found that in
addition,
> both groups rely on identical brain structures for similar tasks.
> Petitto and Zatorre's team discovered that deaf people searching for
> and retrieving signs showed greater activity in the left inferior
> frontal cortex-the same region that lights up in PET scans when
> hearing people rack their brains for words. And when the deaf
subjects
> in the study processed meaningless grammatical hand movements, they
> showed greater blood flow in the planum temporale. In hearing
> individuals, this brain region handles the spoken
equivalent-incoming
> meaningless syllables (such as ba, ta, da and pa) from which all
words
> are made.
>
> The researchers were particularly stunned by this activity in the
> planum temporale among the deaf. For more than 100 years, scientists
> have thought that the tissues there-which receive neural projections
> from the ears-exclusively processed sounds, and nothing else. The
> puzzling finding has led Petitto and Zatorre to propose that perhaps
> areas of the brain once viewed as devoted to sounds actually contain
> different types of cells capable of responding to the patterns of
> natural language in any form. "Such neural specialization for
aspects
> of language patterning appears to be neurally unmodifiable in so far
> as languages with radically different sensory modalities such as
> speech and sign are processed at similar brain sites," the authors
> write, "while, at the same time, the neural pathways for expressing
> and perceiving natural language appear to be neurally highly
> modifiable."
>
> -Kristin Leutwyler.
>
> � 1996-2001 Scientific American, Inc.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads