🚀 go-pugleaf

"-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote in message 
news:JC4_i.11738$CN4.4598@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "]v[etaphoid" <met@phoid.con> wrote in message 
> news:47384c83$0$875$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote in message 
>> news:evLGi.1065$9r.65@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Funny. I didn't see my post as defending anyone. Are you sure 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you aren't just making shit up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was in responce to my dig at Peter Lucarse.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because you can't have a responce without a ponce...
>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose that's why you're here to provide your usual vexation.
>>>>>>>>>> Are you asking or telling?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That was not a question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh - congratulations on spelling ten consecutive words correctly. 
>>>>>>>>>> This time...
>>>>>>>>> Same goes for you, in not repeating yourself consecutively in the 
>>>>>>>>> same sentence. This time...
>>>>>>>> ROFL!  You two -still- at it?  :)
>>>>>>> Looks like it...
>>>>>>> It would be over in a flash if the prick could hold his tongue and 
>>>>>>> resist his compulsive urge to have a go at me. Not once have I 
>>>>>>> instigated it.
>>>>>> Are you saying that his comments genuinely rile you, and that you're 
>>>>>> not doing this for the fun of it?
>>>>>> Just a rhetorical question, more than anything else.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's an observation of his general demeanor towards me. You may have 
>>>>> noticed, that he generally has nothing to say otherwise. I'm sure that 
>>>>> he must go through life looking for an arguement.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you do when someone has a go at you?
>>>>
>>>> In real life or on the Net?
>>>
>>> The "Net" as you put it, is part of life, it's not like you can separate 
>>> it except to delude yourself and say that it doesn't exist, if you are 
>>> into computers in any way, it takes up a portion of what you may do in 
>>> your computing life.
>>>
>>>> On the Net it depends - if I feel like carrying it on further I will, 
>>>> if not I ignore it... depends on the situation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That a philosophical way at looking at it.
>>>
>>>>> What would you do if they keep it up way past the just having fun 
>>>>> stage?
>>>>
>>>> If it was no longer fun I'd just ignore, yeah. Why not?
>>>
>>> Agreed!
>>>
>>>>> ps
>>>>> Don't tell anyone, but I am doing "this for the fun of it".
>>>>
>>>> I won't say a word.
>>>
>>> Cool.
>>
>>
>> You've sounded a little flustered of late...
>
> Blah, Blah, fucking blah, you're just a whinging whining son of a beeatch,
> Megaroid

My apologies - you're clearly not flustered at all. I don't know where we 
all got that idea from, here in alt.support.menopause....