🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1x9T8.92306$s82.6845700@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>, "BigPenguin" says...
>
>Petroleum, like hemp, will replenish fully if allowed the correct amount of
>time, it just seems that hemp has a slightly higher regeneration rate =)
>
>bp

<snicker>  Gee, that's twice in a row I've misspoken. <giggle>  Gotta learn to
be more specific.  <guffaw>

Hell, hemp can even *become* petroleum if you give it the right conditions and
allow it enough time.

BWAAAAAAAhahahahahahhahahahahhahahhhh..... <thud>
--
P

>Pansy <nospam@mybox.org> wrote in message news:afj67i0s95@drn.newsguy.com...
>> In article <MPG.1786811b914e8377989e2e@shawnews.vn.shawcable.net>, tnr
>says...
>> >
>> >In article <afikiu02ma5@drn.newsguy.com>, nospam@mybox.org says...
>> >>In article <MPG.1785a097ae734f04989e2a@shawnews.vn.shawcable.net>, tnr
>says...
>> >> >
>> >> >In article <1103_1025243790@shawnews>, couchfulodogs*@hotmail.com
>> >> >says...
>> >> >> On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 03:01:34 GMT, tnr <tnr@nospam.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > In article <1103_1025223039@shawnews>, couchfulodogs*@hotmail.com
>> >> >> > says...
>> >>>>> > During world war two some hemp farmers were not drafted as they
>were
>> >>needed
>> >> >>for rope production, war runs on
>> >> >> > > rope.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > Gee the current wars seem to run on explosives and bullets.
>> >>>>And to get the bombs and bullets anywhere they were moved around with
>rope. In
>> >> >>WW11 there were not as many synthetics, and hemp rope was
>> >> >> valuable.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >I have no roblem believing that rope was important in 1940.
>> >>
>> >> Good.   It shouldn't be much of a stretch then, to believe that rope is
>still
>> >>just about as important.  We have lots of synthetics now, oil-based for
>the most
>> >> part, which can substitute for hemp (which is renewable,) as long as
>there's
>> >> access to oil (which is *not* renewable)...
>> >
>> >Really? Not renewable? Hmmm I wonder where that olive oil I just bought
>> >came from...
>>
>> Sorry... I did mean petroleum, and I thought it self-evident.   I defy you
>to
>> find me many millions of barrels of olive oil per day and thus show me
>that your
>> statement above isn't simply idiocy for the sake of argument.
>> --
>> P
>>
>
>