🚀 go-pugleaf

N3mEsIS wrote:
> 
> On 27 Apr 2007 20:50:15 -0700, pakihaki22@yahoo.ca wrote:
> 
> >They are universally despised so why should they be allowed to live?

You are absolutely correct that homosexuals are despised by most of
society - but there is a catch - which I will explain in a minute.  
To answer the second part of your question, should homosexuals be
allowed to live - the answer is more difficult.  The moment that
homosexuals are threatened by any society, they transition, for lack of
a better description, and pass as heterosexual by marrying.  Unless
caught in a compromising position, they live their lives as necessary,
marrying a woman and having a guy on the side secretly.  Pretty
difficult to know which men of homosexual persuasion should not be
allowed to live to use your words.  Women, if you ask them, are usually
slightly less satisfied if they have married a homosexual male.  

The most likely population to despise homosexuals are men who have
difficulty for a variety of reasons, finding and maintaining women in
their lives.  This difficulty is even more evident as these males
progress through a marriage.  Men within a marriage usually have to hold
a subservient position to women unless they are rich or wealthy.  

The majority of women marry men who don't earn sufficient money in their
eyes and within those confines men are effectively subservient.   Since
young men haven't figured this out before the first child has arrived,
they certainly get it figured out after the first child has arrived.  A
heterosexual woman will, in the politest language, cause a heterosexual
male far more grief than anyone else on the planet.  This is not an
attack on a woman but merely the realized inadequacy of most males
within the confines of most marriages where the incomes are less than
sufficient for the needs of the family.  

It is at this point in most heterosexual male lives that they realize to
their surprise that homosexual males are the most boring unimportant,
uninteresting individuals on the planet.  And heterosexual male problems
are not made worse or better by the demise or existence of homosexuals. 

   
> >There own familes are repulsed by their perverted lifestyle. 

You are again absolutely correct.  But unlike handicapped children of
modern times whom are brought forward in society and treated as normal
as possible within society publicly, homosexuals are usually hidden,
hidden by the home parent, usually the wife,woman, female, wherein the
homosexuals male has little or no male role models and way, way too many
female role models.   Such a situation doesn't make a homosexual
straight or heterosexual, but like handicapped children, young adults of
by-gone generations, the children/young adults don't have a role model
that will make them fit comfortably in a predominately heterosexual
society.   The best examples are that most homosexuals can't whistle, 
dress and act like most other male heterosexuals and as such stand out
as being weird or uncomfortable both from a heterosexual standpoint and
a homosexual standpoint.   In modern society this has been for the most
part fixed for the handicapped but left for the most part not dealt with
when dealing with homosexual males.  The results are sad. 
 
> > If
> >homosexuals dont have a right to live, which seems pretty obvious, do
> >they have a right to an easy death or do they deserve a slow torture
> >death. 

Homosexuals in a way live a very tortured life, but in another way they
live a blessed life equal to none other on the planet.  Let me explain.

Homosexuals can have for the most party anything that any other
(heterosexual) person in society has, male or female, and much, much
more.  Homosexual lives are only limited by the treatment they get from 
heterosexuals, and beyond that it is a perfect life.   

I think the perfect part doesn't have to be explained because each of us
can explain what is a perfect life and find a homosexual they are
familiar with living it.  

It is then practical to deal with the tortured aspect of a homosexual's
life.   People who contributed to the tortured lives of homosexuals have
huge problems and while this doesn't help the tortured homosexual, it
adds greatly to the life of the heterosexual torturing the homosexual.  
To put it simply:  Do you know anyone who is having a fantastic life who
is adversely talking about homosexuals and the answer will be clearly
no.