Re: Should taxpayers be paying for sex change operations?

Article View: alt.support.srs

Article #159

#159

From: Seamore Tush
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:47

25 lines
3267 bytes

Christine wrote...
> If someone has a birth defect should insurance pay for it YES. That's what 
> they get paid for!  Does insurance pay for birth defects YES. If you can't 
> understand what the hell is going on with GID then you should get educated 
> about it before making such uninformed staements. We can't rewire the human 
> brain as of yet so do you have a better idea. Didn't think so!!!

I know a transexual, or as most people would describe him, "a chick with a
dick."  He lives in California and of course has AIDS, so I'm sure the
state medical system would pay for a sex change operation if he really
wanted it.  I think he prefers the way he is, the freak factor allows him
to earn extra money as a transexual crack whore in Long Beach.

As for whether taxpayers should pay for it, of course not!  We're not
talking about someone born a hermaphrodite who needs an operation to make
him one gender or another, but someone who seems to enjoy being a freak.
His personal perception of himself is irrelevant, just like Michael
Jackson's perception that his nose is too big is irrelevant.  An anorexic
woman may think she is too fat at 56 pounds, but that doesn't mean the
taxpayers need to pay for her diet pills any more than they need to pay
for Michael Jackson's plastic surgery or this transexual's operation to
have his dick cut off.

Anyway, I mentioned his source of income as a crackwhore, that means he
does not qualify for Medi-Cal...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <yxCqf.45199$6e1.29019@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!3a3c0328!not-for-mail

References:

<44172617cb359e2dc6b535786e6f665f@dizum.com> <jqqtp1d9m548s9vu2as1d8kf59i9qlbrnt@4ax.com> <p4Ipf.42373$6e.32286@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10a1fc,cd3b1c78670c4393
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,cd3b1c78670c4393
X-Google-Thread: f824f,cd3b1c78670c4393
X-Google-Thread: 10e405,cd3b1c78670c4393
X-Google-Thread: ff9b3,cd3b1c78670c4393
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1fc,gid10a942,gidf824f,gid10e405,gidff9b3,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!3a3c0328!not-for-mail
From: Seamore Tush <stush@asses.fire.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.support.srs,alt.california,ba.general,alt.fan.howard-stern,alt.gossip.celebrities
Subject: Re: Should taxpayers be paying for sex change operations?
References: <44172617cb359e2dc6b535786e6f665f@dizum.com> <jqqtp1d9m548s9vu2as1d8kf59i9qlbrnt@4ax.com> <p4Ipf.42373$6e.32286@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <p4Ipf.42373$6e.32286@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <yxCqf.45199$6e1.29019@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.132.133.203
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1135277278 ST000 71.132.133.203 (Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:47:58 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:47:58 EST
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: SCSGG[GGCPC_GFD[LZKJOPHAWB\^PBQLGPQRZQMIWIWTEPIB_NVUAH_[BL[\IRKIANGGJBFNJF_DOLSCENSY^U@FRFUEXR@KFXYDBPWBCDQJA@X_DCBHXR[C@\EOKCJLED_SZ@RMWYXYWE_P@\\GOIW^@SYFFSWHFIXMADO@^[ADPRPETLBJ]RDGENSKQQZN
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:47:58 GMT

Reply to Parent Message