🚀 go-pugleaf

Jennifer Usher wrote:
> "Seamore Tush" <stush@asses.fire.net> wrote in message
> news:yxCqf.45199$6e1.29019@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>
> Common sense says I should ignore this, but what the heck...
>
> > I know a transexual, or as most people would describe him, "a chick with a
> > dick."  He lives in California and of course has AIDS, so I'm sure the
> > state medical system would pay for a sex change operation if he really
> > wanted it.  I think he prefers the way he is, the freak factor allows him
> > to earn extra money as a transexual crack whore in Long Beach.
>
> First off, I assume you know this person because you are a client, or as
> most people would describe you, "a john."  That said, a few corrections.  It
> is transsexual, not "transexual," unless you are trying to make a political
> statement (and a silly one at that).  It is sad that this person has AIDS,
> or more likely is HIV+.  I doubt you know the difference.  BTW, I hope you
> get tested regularly.  If if you are always a top, you can still get the
> virus.  If this person does not want SRS, then she is not a transsexual.
> And it is very rare that people choose sex work for reasons other than
> survival.
>
> > As for whether taxpayers should pay for it, of course not!  We're not
> > talking about someone born a hermaphrodite who needs an operation to make
> > him one gender or another, but someone who seems to enjoy being a freak.
> > His personal perception of himself is irrelevant, just like Michael
> > Jackson's perception that his nose is too big is irrelevant.  An anorexic
> > woman may think she is too fat at 56 pounds, but that doesn't mean the
> > taxpayers need to pay for her diet pills any more than they need to pay
> > for Michael Jackson's plastic surgery or this transexual's operation to
> > have his dick cut off.
>
> Quite frankly, I am not going to waste time correcting your ignorance.  It
> is probably pretty much invincible anyway.  Given that SRS is increasingly
> recognized as medically neccesary, your opinion is of little consequence.

Just because you're losing doesn't mean you need to lie.

>
> > Anyway, I mentioned his source of income as a crackwhore, that means he
> > does not qualify for Medi-Cal...
>
> Really?  Why should that matter.  If she is on SSI, she qualifies for
> Medi-Cal.  If she makes enough off of people like you, then no, she would
> not qualify.
> 
> -- 
> Jennifer Usher