Article View: alt.support.srs
Article #175Re: Should taxpayers be paying for sex change operations?
From: Doomella
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:46
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:46
23 lines
2538 bytes
2538 bytes
"Jennifer Usher" <jennisuzan@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ZO-dnU5Z8r7OtTHeRVn-og@rcn.net... > > "Doomella" <doomella@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:_DDqf.6289$u36.2476@trndny01... >> No, taxpayers should not be paying for sex-change operations. >> >> I'm sure it's miserable to feel you were born into the wrong gender, but >> come on. What will stop us from having to foot the bill for people who >> feel they should have been born blonde, straight-haired or green-eyed? >> What about lipo for heavy people who feel that their destiny was to be >> ultra thin? Bald men who feel they should have cascades of Fabio-esque >> hair in order to be psychologically intact? > > To equate transsexualism, which is recognized as a medical condition, with > something like hair color, shows an serious lack of understanding. We are > talking about something that is far more profound than the things you > compare it to. It's an A-N-A-L-O-G-Y. And you don't know how profoundly some people want to be blond.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0CXqf.152$yx.134@trndny01>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!atl-c05.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny01.POSTED!e9dad128!not-for-mailReferences:
<44172617cb359e2dc6b535786e6f665f@dizum.com> <jqqtp1d9m548s9vu2as1d8kf59i9qlbrnt@4ax.com> <p4Ipf.42373$6e.32286@tornado.tampabay.rr.com> <yxCqf.45199$6e1.29019@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <ISCqf.862$dh2.88@trndny08> <_DDqf.6289$u36.2476@trndny01> <ZO-dnU5Z8r7OtTHeRVn-og@rcn.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10a1fc,cd3b1c78670c4393 X-Google-Thread: 10a942,cd3b1c78670c4393 X-Google-Thread: f824f,cd3b1c78670c4393 X-Google-Thread: 10e405,cd3b1c78670c4393 X-Google-Thread: ff9b3,cd3b1c78670c4393 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1fc,gid10a942,gidf824f,gid10e405,gidff9b3,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!atl-c05.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny01.POSTED!e9dad128!not-for-mail From: "Doomella" <doomella@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.srs,alt.california,ba.general,alt.fan.howard-stern,alt.gossip.celebrities References: <44172617cb359e2dc6b535786e6f665f@dizum.com> <jqqtp1d9m548s9vu2as1d8kf59i9qlbrnt@4ax.com> <p4Ipf.42373$6e.32286@tornado.tampabay.rr.com> <yxCqf.45199$6e1.29019@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <ISCqf.862$dh2.88@trndny08> <_DDqf.6289$u36.2476@trndny01> <ZO-dnU5Z8r7OtTHeRVn-og@rcn.net> Subject: Re: Should taxpayers be paying for sex change operations? Lines: 25 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: <0CXqf.152$yx.134@trndny01> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:46:20 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.83.180.235 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny01 1135363580 162.83.180.235 (Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:46:20 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:46:20 EST