🚀 go-pugleaf

Jennifer Usher wrote...
> "Seamore Tush" <stush@asses.fire.net> wrote in message 
> news:yxCqf.45199$6e1.29019@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> 
> Common sense says I should ignore this, but what the heck...
> 
> 
>>I know a transexual, or as most people would describe him, "a chick with a
>>dick."  He lives in California and of course has AIDS, so I'm sure the
>>state medical system would pay for a sex change operation if he really
>>wanted it.  I think he prefers the way he is, the freak factor allows him
>>to earn extra money as a transexual crack whore in Long Beach.
> 
> 
> First off, I assume you know this person because you are a client, or as 
> most people would describe you, "a john."  That said, a few corrections.  It 
> is transsexual, not "transexual," unless you are trying to make a political 
> statement (and a silly one at that).  It is sad that this person has AIDS, 
> or more likely is HIV+.  I doubt you know the difference.  BTW, I hope you 
> get tested regularly.  If if you are always a top, you can still get the 
> virus.  If this person does not want SRS, then she is not a transsexual. 
> And it is very rare that people choose sex work for reasons other than 
> survival.

(it's me...)  Sorry, I don't have HIV, the transexual is something my gay
brother dragged home from the bar.  Though I do happen to be gay, I was
smart enough to know better than to drag transexual crackwhores home from
some bar.  And yes, I know the difference between HIV and AIDS, but the
two terms can be used synonymously UNLESS one is quoting statistics (e.g.
a rosy report that "AIDS" cases have declined by 56% in the last three
while conveniently neglecting to mention that new HIV infections have
increased by 384% in that same time).  For practical purposes the two
terms are interchangable, both indicate you should avoid contact with
that person and his bodily fluids.


>>As for whether taxpayers should pay for it, of course not!  We're not
>>talking about someone born a hermaphrodite who needs an operation to make
>>him one gender or another, but someone who seems to enjoy being a freak.
>>His personal perception of himself is irrelevant, just like Michael
>>Jackson's perception that his nose is too big is irrelevant.  An anorexic
>>woman may think she is too fat at 56 pounds, but that doesn't mean the
>>taxpayers need to pay for her diet pills any more than they need to pay
>>for Michael Jackson's plastic surgery or this transexual's operation to
>>have his dick cut off.
> 
> 
> Quite frankly, I am not going to waste time correcting your ignorance.  It 
> is probably pretty much invincible anyway.  Given that SRS is increasingly 
> recognized as medically neccesary, your opinion is of little consequence.

Just last week the San Francisco Chronicle had some article written by a
psychologist (hereafter referred to as a headfucker) who was just outraged
that mental disorders didn't receive the same insurance coverage as
physical disorders.  As an example, he complained that a broken leg gets
more coverage than depression (perhaps because your dog died), and I
suppose he would put co-dependent relationship issues in the same coverage
category as emergency heart bypass operations.  That's right, dialysis
treatment so you don't die is no different from paying some headfucker
$500 an hour to listen to you whine about your relationship with your
father.  So no, I do not consider transexuality or gender identity
dysphoria or whatever newage feel-good term they use as something requiring
public or private insurance to cover.

I might add that I need a minor operation, not urgent or terribly expensive
but also not cheap and I am a bit uncomfortable, but I have NO insurance
at all.  I have to pay out of my own pocket for it but this trannie gets
the state to pay for his silicone breast implants.


>>Anyway, I mentioned his source of income as a crackwhore, that means he
>>does not qualify for Medi-Cal...
> 
> 
> Really?  Why should that matter.  If she is on SSI, she qualifies for 
> Medi-Cal.  If she makes enough off of people like you, then no, she would 
> not qualify.

Hee hee!  I've actually acquired a dozen or so photos of this sideshow
freak (even Jerry Springer rejected him as a guest on his show), and one
day when I'm feeling mean enough I will post them to a binaries group.
Three of the photos are actual advertisements he placed in some sex
magazine, carefully using the euphemism "massage therapist" for "crack
whore" to keep it legal.  The ad does not mention his HIV+ status, of
course.