🚀 go-pugleaf

JenniferFlusher <jflusher@imaman.org> wrote in
news:hmumh1$aop$1@news.eternal-september.org: 

> On 2010-03-06 12:42:29 -0800, Howard Thomas Usher masquarading as 
> <laskisaliar@nowhere.com> said:
> 
> ----a of of bullshit.
> 
> I'm honored that you created a new sockpuppett just for me !  Even 
> though I'm not your arch imaginary nemesis Dianne (the third person in
> as many weeks you've accused of being her) I am honored nonetheless.

I think Jennifer is right about you bring scared that she is correct.  
You think everyone who disagrees with you has to be her.

> Let's get something straight up front before I obliterate your raving 
> response.  Here it is:  The fact that you use multiple sockpuppetts to
> argue with people make you an internet kook.  The fact that you talk 
> back to them and have conversations with them makes you an internet 
> kook with the mind of a 14 year old.  The fact that you do all that 
> while everyone KNOWS that they are your sockpuppetts and laughs openly
> at you for doing so makes you a mentally deranged internet kook with 
> the mind of a 14 year old.  OK?  Fine.  Now on to your insane
> response. 

You are obsessed with a person you dismiss as being a nobody.  I would 
say you are the kook.

> Point #1 :  You claim that you are not 300+ pounds.  Here is your
> picture: 
> http://picasaweb.google.com/jenniferrusherr/AllAboutMe#
5250861530829948
> 002 
> 
> You're about 6 feet tall so to get THAT much belly and jowledge takes 
> some SERIOUS pounds.  About 300 - probably more.  So you lied about 
> your weight.

No, Jennifer is not 300 pounds,  I see her all the time, and she is 
nowhere near that heavy.  And she weighed less before her surgery.

> And doctors in the U.S. DON'T do SRS on morbidly obese people .  That 
> can be googled or you can ask anyone who actually HAD a sex change.

She is overweight, not morbidly obese.  You are just trying to salvage 
your silly claims.

> Point #2.  You said that you live in a nice room.
> Here are some articles about the drug infested , mentally ill populace
> in the shelter where you live.
> 
> http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-10-10/news/the-vice-hotel/
> 
> http://missionlocal.org/2010/01/women-seek-stability-in-sros/
> 
> So you laid again.  I'm beginning to see a pattern.

Jennifer has never claimed her place is perfect.  Personally, I think 
she could do better, but she prefers to spend her money on other things.  
Her actual room is decent, and they have done a lot of work on the 
place.  Some of the residents are a bit challenged, but many are not.

> Point #3 : About your alleged SRS.  The link that you put up is a page
> with broken links to the surgery benefits from UCSF where you work.  
> Except the links on that page do not work so we can't confirm any of 
> this but let;s take it as gospel for a moment, OK?    You claim to
> have had Kaiser and they did your SRS - perhaps you were the only one

Nope, I know one other who works with us who had surgery a few months 
after Jennifer.

> And your story MIGHT have some merit if it were not for the following 
> exclusion from Kaiser that also appears on that same page:
> 
> --------
> "You pay the following for these covered transgender surgical
> Services: • Office visits: a $15 Copayment per visit
> • Outpatient surgery and other outpatient procedures: a $15
> Copayment per procedure
> • Hospital inpatient care (including room and board, drugs, and Plan
> Physician Services): a $250 Copayment per admission
> 
> Note: The following Services are not covered under this "Transgender 
> Surgery" section:
> • Outpatient prescription drugs (instead, refer to "Outpatient 
> Prescription Drugs, Supplies, and Supplements" in this "Benefits and 
> Cost Sharing" section)
> • Outpatient administered drugs (instead, refer to "Outpatient Care"
> in this "Benefits and Cost Sharing" section)
> • Psychological counseling (instead refer to "Mental Health
> Services" in this "Benefits and Cost Sharing" section)
> • Outpatient laboratory and imaging Services (instead, refer to 
> "Outpatient Imaging, Laboratory, and Special Procedures" in this 
> "Benefits and Cost Sharing" section)"
> -------------
> 
> That's right Howard - for the year preceding your surgery YOU would 
> have had to pay for ALL your psych counseling to get a surgery
> referral - typically a MINIMUM of twice a month at a cost of a MINIMUM
> of $300 a month PLUS you would have had to pay for your electrolysis
> PLUS you would have had to pay for all your hormones yourself (another
> $150-200 expense a month).

You're kidding, right?  Those are all covered benefits under the regular 
plan.  All they are saying is that they don't count against the $75,000 
maximum.  

> And you would have had to cover ALL that on a gross take home pay of 
> $1600 a month MINUS your $500 a month rent at the Mission Hotel.
> 
> Is that really possible Howard?

I guess it was, as she did it.

> But wait - there's more ....  You claim to have gone for surgery in
> the last week of February 2006 and returned to work the first week of
> April 2006 - a six week period.   You only worked 1 year at UCSF and
> only accumulated 10 days sick leave ASSUMING you did not take any sick
> leave to see your endocrinologist  , your psychiatrist, etc.  How did
> you support yourself the OTHER 4 weeks Howard?  Did you save up
> mysterious cash that you couldn't possibly have had teh same way that
> you paid for your hormones , your pshrink and your psychologist?

She used her vacation, as well as her sick leave.  

> The more that you lie Howard the more truth comes out.
> 
> Let;s not even talk about a late 40's man being given permission to 
> have SRS by an HMO after only ONE YEAR in the U.S.  - WTF.  People go 
> to Thailand just to avoid the typically 18 months to 2 year wait .

I have no idea what you mean?  She has lived in the U.S for all her 
life, not one year.  And I do recall she was the first to have hers at 
Kaiser, and I believe in the whole UC system.  There is no waiting 
period for benefits.  

> You could not POSSIBLY have had SRS Howard because you could not 
> POSSIBLY have afforded the additional expenses.  The math is right out
> there.

Your math is imaginary.  All but her copays were covered.

> My best guess is that you Kaiser gave you  an Orch which is much less 
> costly and doesn't require quite as much paperwork and monetary outlay
> on your part and can be approved more quickly.

You are really getting desperate.  You are backed into a corner, and now 
you are trying to save face.  She had full surgery.  I visited her in 
the hospital.

> And here you are , with your Orch , your DIck and your Sockpuppetts 
> posting 40,000 messages (literally) over the internet from your one 
> room assisted -living shelter trying to tell everyone how much of a 
> woman you are.  Who are your trying to convince.  Yourself?

From what I see, you write about 3 or 4 messages to her one.  I think 
you are a bit confused here.