🚀 go-pugleaf

"Diane Lask Is A Liar" <laskisaliar@nowhere.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9D3482A842FE8laskisaliarnowhereco@188.40.43.213...
> JenniferFlusher <jflusher@imaman.org> wrote in
> news:hmumh1$aop$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> On 2010-03-06 12:42:29 -0800, Howard Thomas Usher masquarading as
>> <laskisaliar@nowhere.com> said:
>>
>> ----a of of bullshit.
>>
>> I'm honored that you created a new sockpuppett just for me !  Even
>> though I'm not your arch imaginary nemesis Dianne (the third person in
>> as many weeks you've accused of being her) I am honored nonetheless.
>
> I think Jennifer is right about you bring scared that she is correct.
> You think everyone who disagrees with you has to be her.

Oh well...

>> Let's get something straight up front before I obliterate your raving
>> response.  Here it is:  The fact that you use multiple sockpuppetts to
>> argue with people make you an internet kook.  The fact that you talk
>> back to them and have conversations with them makes you an internet
>> kook with the mind of a 14 year old.  The fact that you do all that
>> while everyone KNOWS that they are your sockpuppetts and laughs openly
>> at you for doing so makes you a mentally deranged internet kook with
>> the mind of a 14 year old.  OK?  Fine.  Now on to your insane
>> response.
>
> You are obsessed with a person you dismiss as being a nobody.  I would
> say you are the kook.

Lask is very much a kook.  A while back, he dug up stuff on Lyle "Laura" 
Blake who hasn't even posted here in years.  He is totally obsessed with 
people he sees as an enemy.

>> Point #1 :  You claim that you are not 300+ pounds.  Here is your
>> picture:
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/jenniferrusherr/AllAboutMe#
> 5250861530829948
>> 002
>>
>> You're about 6 feet tall so to get THAT much belly and jowledge takes
>> some SERIOUS pounds.  About 300 - probably more.  So you lied about
>> your weight.
>
> No, Jennifer is not 300 pounds,  I see her all the time, and she is
> nowhere near that heavy.  And she weighed less before her surgery.

I swear, the more Lask posts, the larger I get.  I'll bet you in six months, 
he will have me up to 400 pounds.

>> And doctors in the U.S. DON'T do SRS on morbidly obese people .  That
>> can be googled or you can ask anyone who actually HAD a sex change.
>
> She is overweight, not morbidly obese.  You are just trying to salvage
> your silly claims.

Lask knows better.  He is just trying to bait me into responding to him. 
Personally, I would recommend not feeding the trolls.

>> Point #2.  You said that you live in a nice room.
>> Here are some articles about the drug infested , mentally ill populace
>> in the shelter where you live.
>>
>> http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-10-10/news/the-vice-hotel/
>>
>> http://missionlocal.org/2010/01/women-seek-stability-in-sros/
>>
>> So you laid again.  I'm beginning to see a pattern.
>
> Jennifer has never claimed her place is perfect.  Personally, I think
> she could do better, but she prefers to spend her money on other things.
> Her actual room is decent, and they have done a lot of work on the
> place.  Some of the residents are a bit challenged, but many are not.

Of course I could do better, but why should I pay twice as much or more for 
little improvement?

>> Point #3 : About your alleged SRS.  The link that you put up is a page
>> with broken links to the surgery benefits from UCSF where you work.
>> Except the links on that page do not work so we can't confirm any of
>> this but let;s take it as gospel for a moment, OK?    You claim to
>> have had Kaiser and they did your SRS - perhaps you were the only one
>
> Nope, I know one other who works with us who had surgery a few months
> after Jennifer.

Okay, that narrows it down a bit more.

>> And your story MIGHT have some merit if it were not for the following
>> exclusion from Kaiser that also appears on that same page:
>>
>> --------
>> "You pay the following for these covered transgender surgical
>> Services: • Office visits: a $15 Copayment per visit
>> • Outpatient surgery and other outpatient procedures: a $15
>> Copayment per procedure
>> • Hospital inpatient care (including room and board, drugs, and Plan
>> Physician Services): a $250 Copayment per admission
>>
>> Note: The following Services are not covered under this "Transgender
>> Surgery" section:
>> • Outpatient prescription drugs (instead, refer to "Outpatient
>> Prescription Drugs, Supplies, and Supplements" in this "Benefits and
>> Cost Sharing" section)
>> • Outpatient administered drugs (instead, refer to "Outpatient Care"
>> in this "Benefits and Cost Sharing" section)
>> • Psychological counseling (instead refer to "Mental Health
>> Services" in this "Benefits and Cost Sharing" section)
>> • Outpatient laboratory and imaging Services (instead, refer to
>> "Outpatient Imaging, Laboratory, and Special Procedures" in this
>> "Benefits and Cost Sharing" section)"
>> -------------
>>
>> That's right Howard - for the year preceding your surgery YOU would
>> have had to pay for ALL your psych counseling to get a surgery
>> referral - typically a MINIMUM of twice a month at a cost of a MINIMUM
>> of $300 a month PLUS you would have had to pay for your electrolysis
>> PLUS you would have had to pay for all your hormones yourself (another
>> $150-200 expense a month).
>
> You're kidding, right?  Those are all covered benefits under the regular
> plan.  All they are saying is that they don't count against the $75,000
> maximum.

Exactly.  My medications are all covered.  I pay $10 every 100 days for 
generics, and $25 for brand names.  And when I was seeing my therapist, it 
was $15 a visit.

>> And you would have had to cover ALL that on a gross take home pay of
>> $1600 a month MINUS your $500 a month rent at the Mission Hotel.
>>
>> Is that really possible Howard?
>
> I guess it was, as she did it.

Actually, at the time of my surgery I was at 75%.  Of course now I am full 
time.

>> But wait - there's more ....  You claim to have gone for surgery in
>> the last week of February 2006 and returned to work the first week of
>> April 2006 - a six week period.   You only worked 1 year at UCSF and
>> only accumulated 10 days sick leave ASSUMING you did not take any sick
>> leave to see your endocrinologist  , your psychiatrist, etc.  How did
>> you support yourself the OTHER 4 weeks Howard?  Did you save up
>> mysterious cash that you couldn't possibly have had teh same way that
>> you paid for your hormones , your pshrink and your psychologist?
>
> She used her vacation, as well as her sick leave.

I remember I ran out of time about a week before I returned.  And it was on 
February 10th, not the last week in February.  And, of course, since I was 
not full time when I had my surgery, no I took no time off.  Also, we get 12 
days a year in sick leave, and 15 days a year in vacation.  Since I had 
worked a bit over a year, and part of that at 75%, I had enough sick leave 
and vacation to make it.  I also got a bit of temporary disability for the 
week I was off without pay.

>> The more that you lie Howard the more truth comes out.
>>
>> Let;s not even talk about a late 40's man being given permission to
>> have SRS by an HMO after only ONE YEAR in the U.S.  - WTF.  People go
>> to Thailand just to avoid the typically 18 months to 2 year wait .
>
> I have no idea what you mean?  She has lived in the U.S for all her
> life, not one year.  And I do recall she was the first to have hers at
> Kaiser, and I believe in the whole UC system.  There is no waiting
> period for benefits.

True.  As I recall, the benefit went into effect the previous July, and 
first saw the surgeon that November.  It too them that long to find someone.

>> You could not POSSIBLY have had SRS Howard because you could not
>> POSSIBLY have afforded the additional expenses.  The math is right out
>> there.
>
> Your math is imaginary.  All but her copays were covered.

True.

>> My best guess is that you Kaiser gave you  an Orch which is much less
>> costly and doesn't require quite as much paperwork and monetary outlay
>> on your part and can be approved more quickly.
>
> You are really getting desperate.  You are backed into a corner, and now
> you are trying to save face.  She had full surgery.  I visited her in
> the hospital.

True.  Now I pretty much know who you are.

>> And here you are , with your Orch , your DIck and your Sockpuppetts
>> posting 40,000 messages (literally) over the internet from your one
>> room assisted -living shelter trying to tell everyone how much of a
>> woman you are.  Who are your trying to convince.  Yourself?
>
> From what I see, you write about 3 or 4 messages to her one.  I think
> you are a bit confused here.

Is he posting that much?  I see the when they are quoted, but otherwise he 
doesn't exist as far as I am concerned.

-- 
Jennifer Usher