🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #102

Re: 8250 vs. 8300 and RAID

#102
From: Tom Scales
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:30
81 lines
4254 bytes
What is there, the XPS with 800FSB or the 8300.  I think we all knew about
the XPS. The question is whether the 8300 is available with the 800FSB.

Tom
"Count Blah" <nochance4spammers@server.com> wrote in message
news:ifmra.662950$L1.188935@sccrnsc02...
> It is there. Check out new series of XPS:
> 3.0 Ghz P4, 800Mhz FSB, 4 fans, 450Watts power...
>
>
> "Robert Johnson" <robertjohnson999@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron...
> > Currently the 8300 has the 530 FSB. I am waiting for the 800 FSB.
> >
> > Count Blah <nochance4spammers@server.com> wrote in article
> > <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53>...
> > > I'm with you Marcos. I've placed my order on the discounted 8250 with
> > 2.8Ghz
> > > on few days ago and cancelled it. Although it had a very good price I
> > found
> > > the following reasons to lean towards 8300:
> > >
> > > - RDRAM is twice more expensive and has to be installed in pairs (so I
> > will
> > > have only ONE expensive upgrade in the future);
> > > - RDRAM will probably be abandoned in the future because newest Intel
> > > chipsets support DC DDR SDRAM;
> > > - Video slot is 8X AGP on 8300 vs. 4X on 8250. Which means that best
> > video
> > > cards will not be used to their full potential on 8250 in the future.
> > > - 3.06 GHz with HT;
> > >
> > > I'm still not sure if the 8300 has 530Mhz or 800 Mhz front side bus
> > speed.
> > > Any info on that?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Marcos M. Zattar" <zattar@t-online.de> wrote in message
> > > news:b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com...
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > I am planning to buy a desktop from DELL and until yesterday I
didn't
> > > > have any doubt, I was up to the Dimension 8250. But then Dell
launched
> > > > a new model here in Germany, the 8300. It claims to be faster
because
> > > > it has the chipset 875P and 533/800 Mhz PSB. Besides, the RDRAM was
> > > > replaced by the DDR. To make the choice more complicated, the 8300
is
> > > > offered here in Germany with a regular hard-disk or optionally with
a
> > > > RAID couple instead (stripe or mirror, you choose). So here my
> > > > questions:
> > > >
> > > > - How much is the increase in performance with the new chipset and
RAM
> > > > type? Is it worth spending those extra bucks for the newer version?
> > > > - What are the advantages of a Serial-ATA harddisk compared to a
> > > > regular EIDE harddisk?
> > > > - It is said that RAID 1 (mirror) is safer regarding a possible disk
> > > > failure and RAID 0 (stripe) is faster. How safer is RAID 1 and how
> > > > faster is RAID 0? Is there really a considerable chance that in a
RAID
> > > > 0 system one of the disks fails, breaks or has a malfunction? In
this
> > > > case, is it true that you lose all your data?
> > > >
> > > > I would appreciate any comments that would help me decide which one
to
> > > > get.
> > > >
> > > > Bye!
> > > > Marcos
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Mcmra.3563$P%6.2889@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe03.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com> <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53> <01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron> <ifmra.662950$L1.188935@sccrnsc02>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,e2de0a0b28bc5c97
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,e2de0a0b28bc5c97
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-28 20:30:28 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe03.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net>
Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.computers.ibm-pc
References: <b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com> <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53> <01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron> <ifmra.662950$L1.188935@sccrnsc02>
Subject: Re: 8250 vs. 8300 and RAID
Lines: 83
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123
Message-ID: <Mcmra.3563$P%6.2889@fe03.atl2.webusenet.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:21:16 EDT
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:30:16 -0400