Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #279Re: Photoshop and scrambled HDDs? [Was: PartitionMagic]
From: Unknown
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:59
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:59
60 lines
3710 bytes
3710 bytes
" Miro" <miro01@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:403a5966$0$28870$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > It is not the swap file that is the problem - IMHO the problem is entirely > this > > 1/ Data files and system swap files get fragmented leaving Photoshop with > non-contiguous cache areas. > > 2/ NT4, Win2000, XP all have inherited an intolerance for 99.99% disk usage. > It is a known bug in the kernel of the OS from the original DEC OS port. As > you know ..... PS can take all the space and still keep asking for more > > 3/ A second drive is ok, so long as it isnt an IDE slave. The presence of a > slave kills the performance of the software > Have you checked out if a RAID makes a difference there? What about SATA and PATA? > 4/ Inadequate ram installation makes the PS cache larger leading to problem > #2 > > 5/ Any inherent faults in the FAT table will be compounded by Photoshop. If > you intend to use PS then perform a Windows check of the file tables. An > unstable Windows installation doesnt get more stable when running photoshop. Checked out NTFS to see if any differences there, too? > > 6/ Photoshop is not compatible with accelerators or add-on memory managers > sometimes seen loaded with 3D gaming setups. The best way to run photoshop > is with Gigs of ram and on a twin or quad processor setup running a generic > install of the OS. Any extra booster technology doesnt actually do anything > profound. Well that bit I actually CAN comment on with some experience. Used PS with accelerators under WIN98 and XP Home and never seen that to be a problem. I can only assume that PS for Windows either disables the accelerator when loaded and enables when exited or doesnt have a problem with most accelerators using Geforce. Havent used it with ATI yet though. > > In most cases the hard drive is the victim and Photoshop is the suspect, but > there is no basis for this assumption. A lot more has to be stuffed before > that will happen. > There is one thing you can do to get over this problem. Real time mirror imaging. Have you any experience with PS and that running?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<IQt_b.322$zm1.10343@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.he.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!216.196.106.144!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!nnrp1.ozemail.com.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<Ftidnb81qKiNJ6XdRVn-tw@comcast.com> <IKd_b.79107$IF1.58871@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <c1d21m$1haird$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de> <c1d2n8$1g7mmv$6@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de> <403a5966$0$28870$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109d17,1a04ed6784cbc3eb X-Google-Attributes: gid109d17,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,1a04ed6784cbc3eb X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,e2f42d11bea3277e X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-23 12:59:21 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.he.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!216.196.106.144!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!nnrp1.ozemail.com.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Unknown" <thisandthat@hereandthere.oz> Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.photo,aus.computers References: <Ftidnb81qKiNJ6XdRVn-tw@comcast.com> <IKd_b.79107$IF1.58871@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <c1d21m$1haird$1@ID-192964.news.uni-berlin.de> <c1d2n8$1g7mmv$6@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de> <403a5966$0$28870$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: Photoshop and scrambled HDDs? [Was: PartitionMagic] Lines: 62 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <IQt_b.322$zm1.10343@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:59:21 +1100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.102.108.66 X-Trace: nnrp1.ozemail.com.au 1077569960 203.102.108.66 (Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:59:20 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:59:20 EST