🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #291

Re: HDD, RAM and Mongrels [Was: 120 GB Hard Drive]

#291
From: Rocket J. Squirrel
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:23
76 lines
4314 bytes
"Mongrel GB"...that's a new one on me. I actually think you are
overcomplicating this topic. The term '120 GB' is used for marketing
purposes. Computers work on the binary system, of course, so 120 GB
translated in binary terms works out to far fewer than 120 billion bytes.

Kind of reminds me of the days before 'truth in advertising' came to the
monitor industry. In those days, a 15-inch monitor was actually less than 15
inches in size. There was a similar thing going on in the boys locker room
during high school, but that's way OT.

Rocky

"Phred" <ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bvb6od$qe8sf$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <0L3Sb.28740$qx2.3400569@stones.force9.net>,
> "John J. Burness" <JohnJBurnessAT@ieeDOT.org> wrote:
> >Chuck Lapre wrote:
> >> I installed my new Dimension XPs today.  The HD is supposed to be 120
GB.
> >> Yet, the total size is listed as 111 GB.  Free space is 104 GB.
> >> I was only going to pay for 80 GB.  This was an upgrade.
> >> Is there a reasonable explanation, or did Dell mess up?
> >
> >You do HAVE a 120G HDD!!
> >
> >If you right-click on the Drive (within Explorer) do you get a total
> >size that exceeds 120,000,000,000? That is 120G (although I have seen
> >199,9xx,xxx,xxx which is NOT 120G but is "near enough").
> >
> >By definition, within EVERY International Standard:-
> >1k = 1,000
> >1M = 1,000k = 1,000,000
> >1G = 1,000M = 1,000,000k = 1,000,000,000
> >
> >In the early days of Computing, simply because it was binary based & far
> >simpler to calculate, 1k was assumed to be 1,024 (in those days nobody
> >had ever thought about 1M, certainly it beyond any dreams to talk about
> >1G). The odd 24 bits were not worth bothering about!!
> >
> >In other words, a "slang", but technically incorrect, definition started
> >to be used.
> >
> >The consequence of the error (or mis-understanding) this creates is
> >guaranteed to confuse most people!
> >
> >Keeping it in strictly Computer Slang definitions
> >1k = 1,024
> >1M = 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,048,576
> >1G = 1,024 x 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,073,741,824
> >
> >For a HDD that is correctly defined as 120G (i.e. 120,000,000,000) this
> >would be displayed as 111.7G.
> >
> >Incidentally, your original 80G HDD would have been displayed as 74.5G!
>
> I actual fact I ran across three definitions of "gigabyte" when
> looking at some hard disk specs on my Dell Dimension 4100 the other
> day -- depending on which source was quoting the data.
>
> 1. Dell itself defines GB as 1000^3 bytes for HDDs, IIRC.
> 2. Windows Explorer (Win ME) uses 1024^3 in "properties".
> 3. Device Manager uses a hybid, 1000^2*1024.
>
> The 1000^3 definition seems to be used universally by manufacturers
> for HDDs these days.  Call it the "HDD GB".
>
> The 1024^3 definition is used widely (always?) for memory. ("RAM GB".)
>
> The hybrid definition(s) seem to apply at whim.  ("Mongrel GB". ;-)
>
>
> Cheers, Phred.
>
> -- 
> ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <94fa00e143a994153c6edd1af73156fe@news.teranews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!151.164.30.34!cyclone.swbell.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news.teranews.com!not-for-mail
References: <40184fe4$0$11463$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <0L3Sb.28740$qx2.3400569@stones.force9.net> <bvb6od$qe8sf$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,b67c5e8af274ac00
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,4803458b00a05a09
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-29 07:34:00 PST
X-Abuse-Report: abuse@teranews.com
Message-ID: <94fa00e143a994153c6edd1af73156fe@news.teranews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!151.164.30.34!cyclone.swbell.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news.teranews.com!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:23:56 GMT
Lines: 78
From: "Rocket J. Squirrel" <rocky@bullwinkle.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.computers
References: <40184fe4$0$11463$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <0L3Sb.28740$qx2.3400569@stones.force9.net> <bvb6od$qe8sf$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: HDD, RAM and Mongrels [Was: 120 GB Hard Drive]
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165